Lefebvriani, la risposta positiva è arrivata (via Fr. Z) - Rorate Caeli
A different take: St. Pius X Society gives mixed response to Vatican
Tuesday, April 17, 2012
James Chastek, Two answers to “why do we form political associations?”
Political friendship, by the nature of friendship, is ordered to some measure of equality? (Or that constitution known as republic/polity?)
Plato says that the city arises from an individual’s inability to meet his own physical needs; Aristotle says that it arises because men are political by nature. At first glace, it seems like Aristotle’s account is facile, or even that it is no explanation at all: “men are naturally political because they are political by nature! What an insight!” But Aristotle’s explanation is the better one. In effect, he is insisting that political life is irreducible. It is not the result of a more fundamental drive or desire – political life itself is the fundamental desire, and it would remain so even if it was not as good at meeting physical needs. This is why his Politics doesn’t begin by considering the individual (and his needs) as the principle of a society, but takes communal life as irreducible.How many modern political theories start with the good of the individual and the myth that society originates in the need of individuals to cooperate for survival?
But if political life is a basic and irreducible need, then just regimes must at least strive to make the regime a place in which the citizens can be truly politically active. Again, where political order reduces to physical need, the Leviathan-state is possible and perhaps even desirable; but where an individual’s political life is an irreducible reality, the Leviathan-state is in flagrant contradiction with the first principle of politics, since no one can lead a political life in the Leviathan state. The Leviathan might meet all the individual’s physical needs, but it does not allow his political actions to make anything beyond a negligible difference.
Political friendship, by the nature of friendship, is ordered to some measure of equality? (Or that constitution known as republic/polity?)
Labels:
common good,
friendship,
human nature,
James Chastek,
politike
St. Thomas and the Keeping of Pets
Might some pets (e.g. dogs) be more suited to be companions for man than others?
Might some pets (e.g. dogs) be more suited to be companions for man than others?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)