Tuesday, September 26, 2006

Reminder: dissertation and theses' regulations

Here

I have not met any of the first-year doctoral students, but brief profiles are available at the department website:

  • William Britt received a BA from Yale University. He is interested in 19th/20th century continental and its relationship to Christian belief/practice especially Nietzsche, Heidegger, Levinas, and Derrida.
  • Fr. Roy Pereira, S.J. was in the Master's program and has been accepted into the Ph.D. program. Fr. Pereira's area is Philosophy of Science with special reference to the Mind-Body issue.
  • Mark Thomas received a BA from Notre Dame. Mark is interested in the continental philosophy of religion, specifically Hegel's philosophy of religion and the relationship of religion with phenomenology and post modern thought.
  • Jessica Williams received a BA from New College of Florida. She intends to focus her studies in contemporary continental philosophy. Her areas of interest include phenomenology, existentialism, German Idealism, post structuralism and postmodern/postcolonial studies.
  • Jeffrey Witt received a BA from Wheaton College. He is interested in the development of late medieval philosophy, i.e. the transmutation of Thomism through the 14th century, its revival in the 16th century, and its arrival into the modern period.
  • Christopher Yates received a BA from The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and received an M.A. degree from the University of Memphis. He is specifically interested in 19th and 20th century French and German thought. This would include phenomenology, deconstruction, archival approaches, and the parallel developments in philosophies of religion.

Well... one person interested in medieval is better than none. But he's from Wheaton College. Perhaps he was influenced by Joshua Hochschild.

Scott MacDonald

His paper was on Augustine, examining some paradoxes in the Confessions. Augustine states several paradoxes and then proceeds to answer them. The paradoxes are interesting, though one wonders if they are really that problematic or paradoxical. As for the presentation itself, I found it a bit dry, and somewhat boring--reading the text and examining the paradoxes could have been done on one's own, and it wouldn't have taken an hour (or more?) to do so...

Not enough controversy to keep me awake...

James O'Donnell (U. Penn) came up in conversation afterwards--apparently he's a good philologist, but not so sharp with respect to the philosophy of the texts. (Charlotte Allen's review of his biography of St. Augustine.)

Which reminds me, I still need to get a copy of Peter Brown's biography of St. Augustine. Interview. A lecture by him at Stanford.
"A Life of Learning"
"Augustine the Bishop in the Light of New Documents"

John von Heyking
Mark Vessey