In honor of our 30th Anniversary Season, now through August 31st, save 30% on all of our CDs, SACDs, and Blu-Ray Audio Recordings with coupon code 30CRAugust at https://t.co/gurkuVWooE pic.twitter.com/3mwjxxyAvK
— Cappella Romana (@cappellaromana) August 18, 2021
6 comments:
ALL THE BOOKS ON VATICAN COUNCIL II ARE WRITTEN WITH A FALSE PREMISE.POPE FRANCIS IS NOT MAGISTERIAL ON THE COUNCIL.
All the books on Vatican Council II throughout the world are written with a false premise.In general a false premise was used.The result is a false inference and non traditional conclusion. A rational premise should have been used. Then the inference would be rational and the conclusion would be traditional.The traditionalists (SSPX,FSSP) have also used the fake premise,like the liberals.
New books are needed.They must have the hermeneutic of continuity.A continuity is needed with the past Magisterium.A continuity is needed with extra ecclesiam nulla salus( with no known practical exceptions in 2021).Vatican Council II (rational) is in harmony with ,the Athanasius Creed.It says all need the Catholic faith for salvation ( with no known exceptions mentioned in Vatican Council II).
Now we can re-read the Catechism of Pope Pius X, 24Q, 27Q.Being saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire are not practical exceptions in the present times(1965-2021).We can go out and proclaim the Good News knowing that all need to accept Jesus in the Catholic Church for salvation( to avoid Hell) and there are no known exceptions in other religions. The Catechism of the Catholic Church 846,1257 has to be re-interpreted rationally.It then supports the absolutist concept of Catholic salvation.
The interpretation of Vatican Council II by Pope Benedict and Pope Francis is irrational .It is not Magisterial.They need to re-interpret the Council, and other Magisterial documents rationally.Then there will be unity with the past Magisterium. Traditionis Custode, and other encylicals and Apostolic Letters of Pope Francis, interpret Vatican Council II with the fake premise. It is the same with Pope Paul VI and Pope John Paul II. They are irrational, heretical and schismatic on the Council.Catholics are not obliged to follow Pope Francis on Vatican Council II.
Pope Franics confuses hypothetical cases of LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II.They are not hypothetical for him. They are objective cases for him. They are objective examples of salvation outside the Catholic Church.They are known people saved without Catholic faith and the baptism of water .So they become practical exceptions to EENS, Syllabus of Errors, Athanasius Creed etc.If they were not visible they could not be exceptions for him.
But there are no such cases in our reality on earth. We cannot meet someone saved with the baptism of desire(LG 14) or invincible ignorance(LG 16) on earth.They are always invisible for us human beings. If any one was saved as such it could only be known to God. The norm for salvation is ‘faith and baptism’(AG 7).It is not invincible ignorance, the baptism of desire or LG 8,GS 22 etc.
Vatican Council II is dogmatic and traditional and supports the norm for salvation.It is not just a pastoral Council. –Lionel Andrades
Lionel Andrades
Promoter of the Lionel Andrades interpretation of Vatican Council II.For him the Council is dogmatic and not only pastoral.
Writer on the discovery of the two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other is irrational, one is interpreted with the false premise and the other without it. One is Magisterial and the other, the common one, is non Magisterial.
It is the same for the Creeds and Catechisms.
There can be two interpretations.
Why should Catholics choose an irrational version which is heretical, non traditional and schismatic, when a rational option is there which is traditional ?
Blog: Eucharist and Mission (eucharistandmission )
E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail.com
ALL CATHOLICS ARE FREE TO INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONALLY LIKE ME INSTEAD OF IRRATIONALLY LIKE THE PRESENT TWO POPES.
EMPTY
All Catholics are free to interpret Vatican Council II rationally like me instead of irrationally like the present two popes, the cardinals and bishops.They simply have to look at LG 8, LG 14,LG 16,UR 3,NA 2,GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II, as being ‘null sets’, deadwood and flotsam, empties.They have to be seen as only theoretical and speculative cases in 2021.They exist only in our mind.This is what they always were- hypothetical only.This changes the interpretation of Vatican Council II.
INVISIBLE-VISIBLE DISTINCTION IS IMPORTANT
It is imporant to be aware of the invisible-visible distinction.Most Catholics are already making the invisible-visible distinction when they interpret Vatican Council II.They assume that LG 8, LG 14,LG 16,UR 3,NA 2, GS 22 etc refer to physically visible cases in 1965-2021.So they are projected as exceptions for EENS, the Syllabus of Errors etc.It is only when they start thinking about it they realize that these are physically invisible cases in real life.So they cannot be practical exceptions to EENS and Tradition.There really is no rupture with Tradition.
FOR THERE TO BE AN EXCEPTION, AN EXCEPTION MUST BE VISIBLE
Since for there to be an exception, an exception must exist.I give the example of an apple in a box of oranges.The apple is an exception not only because it is different but because it exists in that box.If it was not there in that box it would not be an exception.In the same way a catechumen, who desires the baptism of water and dies before receiving it and is saved is always a hypothetical case.So it is not an exception for Feeneyite EENS.The Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston made an objective mistake.-Lionel Andrades
Lionel Andrades
Promoter of the Lionel Andrades interpretation of Vatican Council II.For him the Council is dogmatic and not only pastoral.
Writer on the discovery of the two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other is irrational, one is interpreted with the false premise and the other without it. One is Magisterial and the other, the common one, is non Magisterial.
It is the same for the Creeds and Catechisms.
There can be two interpretations.
Why should Catholics choose an irrational version which is heretical, non traditional and schismatic, when a rational option is there which is traditional ?
Blog: Eucharist and Mission (eucharistandmission )
E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail.com
AUGUST 4, 2021
Poland and Hungary need to adopt the Lionel Andrades interpretation of Vatican Council II https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/08/poland-and-hungary-need-to-adopt-lionel.html
TODOS LOS CATÓLICOS SON LIBRES DE INTERPRETAR EL CONCILIO VATICANO II RACIONALMENTE COMO YO EN LUGAR DE IRRACIONALMENTE COMO LOS DOS PAPAS ACTUALES.
VACÍO
Todos los católicos son libres de interpretar el Concilio Vaticano II racionalmente como yo en lugar de irracionalmente como los dos papas actuales, los cardenales y los obispos. Simplemente tienen que mirar LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22, etc. en el Concilio Vaticano II, como `` conjuntos nulos '', madera muerta y restos flotantes, vacíos.Tienen que ser vistos solo como casos teóricos y especulativos en 2021.Existen solo en nuestra mente.Esto es lo que siempre fueron, solo hipotéticos. cambia la interpretación del Concilio Vaticano II.
LA DISTINCIÓN INVISIBLE-VISIBLE ES IMPORTANTE
Es importante ser conscientes de la distinción invisible-visible. La mayoría de los católicos ya están haciendo la distinción invisible-visible cuando interpretan el Concilio Vaticano II. Asumen que LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc se refieren a casos físicamente visibles en 1965-2021, por lo que se proyectan como excepciones para EENS, el programa de errores, etc., solo cuando empiezan a pensar en ello se dan cuenta de que se trata de casos físicamente invisibles en la vida real. ser excepciones prácticas a la EENS y la Tradición. Realmente no hay ruptura con la Tradición.
PARA QUE HAY UNA EXCEPCIÓN, UNA EXCEPCIÓN DEBE SER VISIBLE
Ya que para que haya una excepción debe existir una excepción, doy el ejemplo de una manzana en una caja de naranjas, la manzana es una excepción no solo porque es diferente sino porque existe en esa caja, si no estaba ahí en esa caja no sería una excepción, de la misma manera un catecúmeno, que desea el bautismo de agua y muere antes de recibirlo y se salva es siempre un caso hipotético, por lo que no es una excepción para Feeneyite EENS. el Santo Oficio de 1949 al arzobispo de Boston cometió un error objetivo.-Lionel Andrades
Lionel Andrades
Promotor de la interpretación de Lionel Andrades del Concilio Vaticano II. Para él, el Concilio es dogmático y no solo pastoral.
Escritor sobre el descubrimiento de las dos interpretaciones del Concilio Vaticano II, una es racional y la otra es irracional, una se interpreta con la premisa falsa y la otra sin ella. Uno es Magisterial y el otro, el común, no Magisterial.
Lo mismo ocurre con los Credos y Catecismos.
Puede haber dos interpretaciones.
¿Por qué los católicos deberían elegir una versión irracional que es herética, no tradicional y cismática, cuando existe una opción racional que es tradicional?
Blog: Eucharist and Mission (Eucaristía y Misión) (eucharistandmission)
Correo electrónico: lionelandrades10@gmail.com
4 DE AGOSTO DE 2021
España, Polonia y Hungría deben adoptar la interpretación de Lionel Andrades del Concilio Vaticano II
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/08/poland-and-hungary-need-to-adopt-lionel.html
20.08.2021
ALLE KATHOLIKEN STEHEN FREI, DEN VATIKANISCHEN KONZIL II RATIONAL WIE MICH ZU INTERPRETIEREN, STATT irrational WIE DIE GEGENWÄRTIGEN BEIDEN PÄPSTE.
Allen Katholiken steht es frei, das Zweite Vatikanische Konzil rational wie ich zu interpretieren, anstatt irrational wie die beiden gegenwärtigen Päpste, die Kardinäle und Bischöfe. Sie müssen sich nur LG 8, LG 14, LG 16,UR 3,NA 2,GS 22 usw im Zweiten Vatikanischen Konzil als „Nullsätze“, Totholz und Treibgut, leer. Sie sind 2021 nur als theoretische und spekulative Fälle zu betrachten. Sie existieren nur in unserem Kopf. Das waren sie immer – nur hypothetisch ändert die Auslegung des Zweiten Vatikanischen Konzils.
Es ist wichtig, sich der Unsichtbar-Sichtbar-Unterscheidung bewusst zu sein. Die meisten Katholiken machen bereits die Unsichtbar-Sichtbar-Unterscheidung, wenn sie das Zweite Vatikanische Konzil interpretieren. Sie gehen davon aus, dass LG 8, LG 14, LG 16,UR 3,NA 2, GS 22 usw. beziehen sich auf physisch sichtbare Fälle in den Jahren 1965-2021. Sie werden also als Ausnahmen für EENS, den Lehrplan der Fehler usw. projiziert. Erst wenn sie darüber nachdenken, erkennen sie, dass dies im wirklichen Leben physikalisch unsichtbare Fälle sind praktische Ausnahmen von EENS und Tradition sein. Es gibt wirklich keinen Bruch mit der Tradition.
Denn für eine Ausnahme muss es eine Ausnahme geben. Ich nenne das Beispiel eines Apfels in einer Orangenschachtel. Der Apfel ist nicht nur eine Ausnahme, weil er anders ist, sondern weil er in dieser Schachtel existiert. Wenn er nicht da wäre in dieser Box wäre es keine Ausnahme. Ebenso ist ein Katechumene, der die Wassertaufe wünscht und stirbt, bevor er sie erhält und gerettet wird, immer ein hypothetischer Fall. Es ist also keine Ausnahme für Feeneyite EENS.The Letter of das Heilige Offizium 1949 an den Erzbischof von Boston machte einen objektiven Fehler.-Lionel Andrades
Lionel Andrades
Förderer der Lionel Andrades-Interpretation des II. Vatikanischen Konzils.
Schriftsteller über die Entdeckung der beiden Interpretationen des Zweiten Vatikanischen Konzils, eine ist rational und die andere irrational, eine wird mit der falschen Prämisse und die andere ohne sie interpretiert. Einer ist lehramtlich und der andere, der gewöhnliche, ist nicht lehramtlich.
Das gleiche gilt für die Glaubensbekenntnisse und Katechismen.
Es kann zwei Interpretationen geben.
Warum sollten Katholiken eine irrationale Version wählen, die häretisch, nicht traditionell und schismatisch ist, wenn es eine rationale Option gibt, die traditionell ist?
Blog: Eucharist and Mission (eucharistandmission )
E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail.com
AUGUST 4, 2021
Poland and Hungary need to adopt the Lionel Andrades interpretation of Vatican Council II https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/08/poland-and-hungary-need-to-adopt-lionel.html
20.08.2021
TOUS LES CATHOLIQUES SONT LIBRES D'INTERPRETER RATIONNELLEMENT LE CONSEIL DU VATICAN II COMME MOI AU LIEU D'IRRATIONNELLEMENT COMME LES DEUX PAPES ACTUELS.
Tous les catholiques sont libres d'interpréter le Concile Vatican II de manière rationnelle comme moi au lieu d'être irrationnel comme les deux papes actuels, les cardinaux et les évêques. Ils n'ont qu'à regarder LG 8, LG 14,LG 16,UR 3,NA 2,GS 22 etc. au Concile Vatican II, comme étant des « ensembles nuls », du bois mort et des épaves, des vides.Ils doivent être considérés comme uniquement des cas théoriques et spéculatifs en 2021.Ils n'existent que dans notre esprit. change l'interprétation du Concile Vatican II.
Il est important d'être conscient de la distinction invisible-visible. La plupart des catholiques font déjà la distinction invisible-visible lorsqu'ils interprètent le Concile Vatican II. Ils supposent que LG 8, LG 14,LG 16,UR 3,NA 2, GS 22 etc. se réfèrent à des cas physiquement visibles en 1965-2021. Ils sont donc projetés comme des exceptions pour EENS, le Syllabus des erreurs, etc. Ce n'est que lorsqu'ils commencent à y penser qu'ils se rendent compte qu'il s'agit de cas physiquement invisibles dans la vie réelle. être des exceptions pratiques à l'EENS et à la Tradition. Il n'y a vraiment pas de rupture avec la Tradition.
Car pour qu'il y ait une exception, il faut qu'une exception existe. Je donne l'exemple d'une pomme dans une boîte d'oranges. La pomme est une exception non seulement parce qu'elle est différente mais parce qu'elle existe dans cette boîte. Si elle n'y était pas dans cette boîte ce ne serait pas une exception. De la même manière un catéchumène, qui désire le baptême d'eau et meurt avant de le recevoir et est sauvé est toujours un cas hypothétique. Ce n'est donc pas une exception pour Feeneyite EENS. La lettre de le Saint-Office 1949 à l'archevêque de Boston a fait une erreur objective.-Lionel Andrades
Lionel Andrades
Promoteur de l'interprétation Lionel Andrades du Concile Vatican II. Pour lui, le Concile est dogmatique et pas seulement pastoral.
Écrivain sur la découverte des deux interprétations du Concile Vatican II, l'une est rationnelle et l'autre est irrationnelle, l'une est interprétée avec la fausse prémisse et l'autre sans elle. L'un est Magistral et l'autre, le commun, n'est pas Magistral.
Il en est de même pour les Credo et les Catéchismes.
Il peut y avoir deux interprétations.
Pourquoi les catholiques devraient-ils choisir une version irrationnelle qui est hérétique, non traditionnelle et schismatique, alors qu'il existe une option rationnelle qui est traditionnelle ?
Blog: Eucharist and Mission (eucharistandmission )
E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail.com
AUGUST 4, 2021
Francia, Poland and Hungary need to adopt the Lionel Andrades interpretation of Vatican Council II
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/08/poland-and-hungary-need-to-adopt-lionel.html
AT THE PLACUIT DEO PRESS CONFERENCE(2018) CARDINAL LADARIA WAS CRITICAL OF NEO GNOSTICISM AND PELAGIANISM HERESY.NOW WE KNOW THAT HE WAS REFERRING TO CATHOLIC ORTHODOXY. THOSE WHO AFFIRM CATHOLIC ORTHODOXY. THOSE WHO AFFIRM CATHOLIC ORTHODOXY WOULD BE GNOSTIC
At the Placuit Deo press conference (2018) Cardinal Ladaria was critical of neo Gnosticism and Pelagianism heresy.Now we know that he was referring to Catholic orthodoxy.Those who affirm Catholic orthodoxy would be gnostic.It is similar to the political hate of the political Left.At the conference when he was asked to give specific examples of heresy in the present times, he would not do so.
So mortal sins of faith will officially be excommunicated by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF).It will be enforced as new Catholic doctrine.The CDF will work for Satan instead of God.
The Church has gone into reverse on faith and morals.
The CDF’s critical statement on homosexual unions, was orthodoxy,It could be gnosticism in future, after Cardinal Ladaria retires.
In the 16th century gnosticism referred to heresy whch rejected Catholic orthodoxy. Now it is the opposite.
Since 1965 we have a political version of Vatican Council It' conclusion would be gnostic for the 16th century Magisterium and missionaries of that time.
In future when Vatican Council II is interpreted without the fake premise, inference and non traditional conclusion, it will support Tradition. With the rational premise it will not oppose Tradition like today. So then Vatican Council II will be considered heretical and gnostic.In future the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX) could be labelled a gnostic organisation and legally not Catholic.They could be excommunicated.
Public signs of ‘the true Church’ will be prohibited.Bishop Robert Barron’s Word on Fire and the National Catholic Reporter, etc interpret Vatican Council II with a fake premise.They will be permitted.-Lionel Andrades
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/08/alla-conferenza-stampa-di-placuit-deo.html
https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/248689/pope-francis-nostalgia-is-the-siren-song-of-religious-life
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/08/pope-francis-wants-inculturation-with.html
FRANCIS COMPLAINS OF LITURGICAL ‘IDEOLOGY’
https://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/francis-criticizes-liturgical-ideology
Post a Comment