Legislation, writes liturgical scholar and historian Dom Alcuin Reid, cannot change historical facts. Nor can an act of legal positivism determine what is or is not part of the 'lex orandi' of the Church.https://t.co/8aAkUfALFH
— Catholic World Report (@cworldreport) August 7, 2021
(1/5) I mean, sure, it'd be nice if the NO was celebrated in a way continuous with the tradition.
— Matthew Hazell (@M_P_Hazell) August 6, 2021
But I'd hoped that, by now, we might have started to move past the (still important) issue of the ars celebrandi, & into a more substantial analysis of the post-conciliar reforms... https://t.co/kNIfbTZMKL
Iota Unum, our popular series of online talks are back.
— Latin Mass Society (@latinmassuk) August 6, 2021
To launch the new series @LMSChairman gives an in-depth analysis on the recent Motu Proprio, Traditionis Custodes.https://t.co/XPyFNNh5ya
All the talks in the series are available on Podbean, Spotify and our website. pic.twitter.com/UWtEFiAz38
1 comment:
VATICAN COUNCIL II IS DOGMATIC. WE ARE NO MORE LIMITED BY HALF A CENTURY OF ERROR. WE HAVE FOUND THE MISSING LINK.WE NOW KNOW HOW TO CONSISTENTLY, SYSTEMATICALLY AND REGULARLY CREATE THE HERMENEUTIC OF CONTINUITY WITH TRADITION WHEN READING VC2
Vatican Council II was a political Left document which has a built in weakness, an error, which permits us to interpret it in harmony with there being exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.We simply do not confuse what is hypothetical as not being hypothetical.The Council Fathers and Pope Paul VI wrongly interpreted LG 8, LG 14, LG 16,UR 3,NA 2,GS 22 etc as being objective, visible in the flesh cases in the present times (1949-1965).Now we must look at LG 8 etc as being only theoretical and speculative always.They exist only in our mind.They cannot be anything else for us on earth.So we do not project them as practical exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS), the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX etc.
The Council is dogmatic.It supports Feeneyite EENS.There is no development of doctrine when the false premise( invisible cases are visible in 2021) is avoided.The Council supports the dogma EENS as it was known to the missionaries in the 16th century.This is a big setback for Pope Benedict and Pope Francis.We are no more limited by half a century of error.We have found the missing link.We now know how to consistently,systematically and regularly create the hermeneutic of continuity with Tradition when reading VC2.-Lionel Andrades
Lionel Andrades
Promoter of the Lionel Andrades interpretation of Vatican Council II.For him the Council is dogmatic and not only pastoral.
Writer on the discovery of the two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other is irrational, one is interpreted with the false premise and the other without it. One is Magisterial and the other, the common one, is non Magisterial.
It is the same for the Creeds and Catechisms.
There can be two interpretations.
Why should Catholics choose an irrational version which is heretical, non traditional and schismatic, when a rational option is there which is traditional ?
Blog: Eucharist and Mission (eucharistandmission )
E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail.com
___________________
AUGUST 4, 2021
Poland and Hungary need to adopt the Lionel Andrades interpretation of Vatican Council II https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/08/poland-and-hungary-need-to-adopt-lionel.html
AUGUST 4, 2021
The Lionel Andrades interpretation of Vatican Council II is not a break with Tradition. Pope Francis' interpretation of Vatican Council II in Traditionis Custode is a rupture with 'the true Church' and the past Magisterium on EENS, Syllabus of Errors, Athanasius Creed etc
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/08/the-lionel-andrades-interpretation-of.html
Post a Comment