Katherine Sonderegger on the Inner Life of God

Many thanks to all who were able to join us yesterday for our panel discussion with Katherine Sonderegger. We really enjoyed hosting this lovely event, featuring @dannyhills33, @bethfelkerjones, @FredFredSanders, and @klh_sanders.

Here's the video: https://t.co/yIFdw4Zvjn

— Henry Center (@henry_center) January 29, 2021

A New Book on Karl Barth

A new book about the adulterous love-triangle of the modern "Church Father of Protestantism," Karl Barth (replacing Schleiermacher). Still, how much truth can be found in a man's writing if he did not attempt to live truth? https://t.co/PbZbGAsrV0

— Ulrich L. Lehner (@ulrichlehner) August 20, 2020

Klöpfer & Meyer Verlag: Zu dritt. Karl Barth, Nelly Barth, Charlotte von Kirschbaum

A Translation of Barth

English.OP.org

Ad Limina Apostolorum

First Things: Karl Barth's Failure by Matthew Rose

Next Friday at the DSPT

DSPT Events

Dumb Ox Theology Forum: Fr. Thomas Joseph White, OP - Aquinas on Imperfect Happiness: Nature, Grace and the Final End of Man

Friday, April 11, 2014 DSPT Dumb Ox

Both Karl Barth and Henri De Lubac provided powerful, compelling visions of the relationship between the grace of God and human nature. However, their visions are in many respects opposed and incompatible. In his reading of Aristotle, Aquinas focuses on the imperfection of all natural human happiness, and on the natural desire for God. How does his vision provide a potential bridge between the diverse theologies of Barth and De Lubac?

Dumb Ox Theological Forum


Man, missed this - don't recall seeing it on my FB feed:

November 12, 2013 - Dr. Donald S. Prudlo jsu.edu , Associate Professor of Ancient and Medieval History, Jacksonville State University - Canonization and Infallibility: An Historical, Canonical, and Theological Investigation

Ever since the definition of Papal Infallibility at the First Vatican Council, there has been a lively debate in the Church about its meaning. This talk will address the roots of that doctrine in the middle ages, and in particular trace its development in the practice of the canonization of saints.
DSPT Dumb Ox Theology Forum - Canonization and Infallibility: An Historical, Canonical, and Theological Investigation Papal canonization did not really begin to take off until the 12th century. The challenge quickly became how to understand it apart from local and episcopal canonizations. At the same time various groups of heretics were beginning to challenge the doctrine of the Communion of saints, as well as the cultic practices of Christianity surrounding the tombs of its holy ones. In the 13th century the papacy and the new Mendicant orders established a symbiotic relationship that saw the elevation of Franciscan and Dominican saints. Some of these had been intimately involved in the suppression of heresy. Criticism of the cult of saints moved from the general to the particular, as individual saints came under attack. This forced the papacy and the Mendicant theologians to examine more closely the doctrine of papal canonization. By the end of
the thirteenth century, the difference had been established: papal canonizations enjoyed infallibility.
Canonization lies at the root of the personal infallibility dogma, and this will be the subject of the lecture.

An essay dealing with the Filioque by a friend (who is Orthodox) and his secondary bibliography

A report on the Aquinas-Barth conference

Op-StJoseph: Thomas Aquinas - Karl Barth Dialogue

Aquinas-Barth Conference

At Princeton in June.