Book Review: "Patristic and Scholastic Theology and Their Environment" by Metropolitan Hierotheos of Nafpaktoshttps://t.co/NLB15ff4lg pic.twitter.com/e0164c0W9q
— Mystagogy Resource Center (@mystagogy1) May 14, 2021
Showing posts with label Latin scholasticism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Latin scholasticism. Show all posts
Saturday, May 15, 2021
Patristic and Scholastic Theology and Their Environment
Thursday, May 13, 2021
Domingo de Soto on the Two Powers
Domingo de Soto on the two powers https://t.co/ZAxKNdtxla
— The Josias (@josias_rex) May 13, 2021
Tuesday, May 11, 2021
Limits According to... Latin Traditionalists?
I just finished reading this book; it's an interesting study on the limits of the papacy. Well worth a read. pic.twitter.com/OHCgoWHIyF
— Hold to Tradition (@TraditionTo) May 11, 2021
Wednesday, October 21, 2020
The Papal Magisterium
Where in Vatican I does it say that it (along with infallibility) is limited to certain document types written by the bishop of Rome, or that certain formulae must be used to signal that it is ex cathedra?
Let's not forget that Francis believes even the things he says to the media are part of his magisterium: https://t.co/pw5uOm0v2n @CMReport
— Steve Skojec (@SteveSkojec) October 21, 2020
Labels:
Latin scholasticism,
Patriarchate of Rome,
Vatican I
Thursday, July 09, 2020
Luis de Molina, Latin Integralist
A new translation from The Josias, with an introductory note addressing some recent confusions. https://t.co/KCPmnNBVuV
— Pater Edmund (@sancrucensis) July 8, 2020
Monday, May 11, 2020
The Ongoing Dispute About the Anaphora/Eucharistic Prayer
And when Christ becomes sacramentally or truly present on the altar.
NLM: East-West Disagreements about the Epiclesis and Transubstantiation by Peter Kwasniewski
A modified Tridentine position that is close to the "holistic" position of Fr. Louis Bouyer, who thinks that the Words of Consecration effect consecration of the sacred species but the whole anaphora is important. (But not the same as Fr. Robert Taft's, who talks of the necessity of the whole anaphora, both the institution narrative whether explicit or not and an explicit expiclesis, if there is one.) But Trent was not an ecumenical council with representatives from all of the Apostolic Churches, nor did it take into consideration the liturgies from the traditions of those Churches.
NLM: East-West Disagreements about the Epiclesis and Transubstantiation by Peter Kwasniewski
A modified Tridentine position that is close to the "holistic" position of Fr. Louis Bouyer, who thinks that the Words of Consecration effect consecration of the sacred species but the whole anaphora is important. (But not the same as Fr. Robert Taft's, who talks of the necessity of the whole anaphora, both the institution narrative whether explicit or not and an explicit expiclesis, if there is one.) But Trent was not an ecumenical council with representatives from all of the Apostolic Churches, nor did it take into consideration the liturgies from the traditions of those Churches.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)