“To serve the Queen of Heaven is already to reign there, and to live under her commands is more than to govern.” - Saint John Vianney
— IHE (@HumanEcologyCUA) August 22, 2024
Happy feast of the Queenship of Mary!#Catholic #Catholicism #CatholicChurch #FeastDay #Scripture #Tradition #PrayForUs #HolyMenAndWomen pic.twitter.com/F8yHIQ5SwY
Showing posts with label Latin tradition. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Latin tradition. Show all posts
Thursday, August 22, 2024
The Queenship of Mary?
Thursday, May 27, 2021
A Laudable Change
even if Latin traditionalists don't agree.
From : Calendar Clues: Pope Francis and the Lex Orandi of Papal Maximalism
As far as I'm concerned, for the Roman rite to be aligned with the East in recognizing that the three women were distinct individuals and not one in the same, is correct.
From : Calendar Clues: Pope Francis and the Lex Orandi of Papal Maximalism
The alterations to the quasi-octave of 22 July-29 July are twofold: Magdalene is now a feast, and Martha’s day is now Mary, Martha, and Lazarus. The latter change follows what had become the practice of the monastic rite. It makes an implicit declaration that Magdalene and Mary of Bethany are not the same woman; this had been asserted in the unofficial commentary that accompanied the 1969 calendar. The traditional liturgy for 22 July is a composite liturgy: there are allusions to Magdalene; to Mary of Bethany; and to the anonymous peccatrix of Luke’s gospel. No woman is omitted; no rigorous delineation of identities is imposed on the lex orandi.
As far as I'm concerned, for the Roman rite to be aligned with the East in recognizing that the three women were distinct individuals and not one in the same, is correct.
Saturday, May 02, 2020
An Excerpt from Fiedrowicz’s Book
Something not included with Krwasniewski's recommendation over at Rorate Caeli, a link to which I posted here.
NLM: Best One-Volume Scholarly Introduction to the Traditional Mass, Now in English by
Peter Kwasniewski
NLM: Best One-Volume Scholarly Introduction to the Traditional Mass, Now in English by
Peter Kwasniewski
Monday, March 30, 2020
Tradivox, Again
Tradivox: Where Latin tradition of the second millenium is identified with the Tradition of the Church Universal.
1P5: Tradivox: Bringing Solid Catechisms to the Hungry Faithful
1P5: Tradivox: Bringing Solid Catechisms to the Hungry Faithful
Which catechism is the best?
We get asked this constantly, and the answer really depends on how you measure. A few certainly stand out. The Roman Catechism remains the most authoritative. There are the priceless historical works of Saints Canisius and Bellarmine. The excellent little catechism of Pope St. Pius X must be mentioned, and the extensively reprinted Baltimore Catechism comes to mind for many Americans. These would be a few of the more significant texts in the genre.
Are these your own personal favorites?
Actually, no. My personal favorites are some of the more obscure texts, mostly for devotional reasons. I’ve grown to deeply love the Catholic martyrs and confessors from the early years of the Anglican schism, so there are several catechisms “baptized in blood” from that period that are dear to me — Vaux, Turberville, Doulye, and White, to name a few. The later, more compendious works of Bp. George Hay and Fr. Michael Müller are some other favorites.
The catechisms must all have fascinating histories.
Yes, there are so many stories. We try to give some of that backdrop in the preface of each volume, hoping to assist readers in experiencing a greater spiritual kinship with our Catholic forebears. I recall one man sharing with us that after reading Volume 1 of our Index, he not only learned things about the Faith that he had never heard (after years of Catholic schooling), but was also deeply moved by reading with awareness that these texts were very much written “by martyrs, for martyrs.”
Saturday, November 30, 2019
King Doesn't Quite Capture It
From 2014: Not Just in Our Hearts: The True Social Kingship of Christ by Steve Skojec
Christ the King and Original Sin by Timothy Flanders
Pius XI, Quas Primas
Pantocrator sounds much better to my ears. Chris is the Ruler of All because he is the rule, God's Law, the word, Divine Wisdom. Rulers do not rule in his place but in Him, participating in Him. If we accept the development of the three-fold office of the laity as a legitimate theological development, then all are kings even if not all share in political governance. They participate in the Divine Law who is Christ, even those who are subject or subordinate to others.
Some nuances are needed to correct exaggerations of the sacred status of authority in pieces such as this: First Things: Sacral Presidency by Peter J. Leithart
Christ the King and Original Sin by Timothy Flanders
Pius XI, Quas Primas
Pantocrator sounds much better to my ears. Chris is the Ruler of All because he is the rule, God's Law, the word, Divine Wisdom. Rulers do not rule in his place but in Him, participating in Him. If we accept the development of the three-fold office of the laity as a legitimate theological development, then all are kings even if not all share in political governance. They participate in the Divine Law who is Christ, even those who are subject or subordinate to others.
Some nuances are needed to correct exaggerations of the sacred status of authority in pieces such as this: First Things: Sacral Presidency by Peter J. Leithart
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)