"Conservatism is built on gratitude. The conservative prioritizes the wisdom of tradition. He understands that he does not know more than the wealth of knowledge that has been passed down to him." - @mrJSDavenport for @ubookman: https://t.co/JCq9T0Ezmx. pic.twitter.com/EdJ0zJ7Ub9
— Russell Kirk Center (@KirkCenter) March 23, 2021
Showing posts with label virtue ethics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label virtue ethics. Show all posts
Tuesday, March 23, 2021
"Conservatism"
Gratitude is a central virtue for the noble life in general. It is time to stop talking about "conservatism"; others have already been talking about virtue ethics and the natural law, and the label "conservative" no longer means anything.
Labels:
American conservatism,
gratitude,
virtue ethics,
virtues
Saturday, May 16, 2020
Saturday, November 30, 2019
Gratitude
OrthoChristian: On Gratitude and Human Happiness by Sergei Khudiev
Labels:
Christianity,
Eucharist,
eudaimonism,
virtue ethics
Friday, July 12, 2019
Monday, October 15, 2018
Friday, September 01, 2017
CWR: “Amoris Laetitia” and the chasm in modern moral theology by Fr. D. Vincent Twomey, SVD
Can the apostolic exhortation help bridge the chasm that, since 1968, has divided moral theologians in matters of sexual morality?
Can the apostolic exhortation help bridge the chasm that, since 1968, has divided moral theologians in matters of sexual morality?
Saturday, July 30, 2016
Saturday, July 25, 2015
One thing a discussion of the virtues within moral theology or moral philosophy can easily incorporate is sex differences, which could easily be ignored if the focus was solely on law or the morality of human acts.
Labels:
law,
moral philosophy,
moral theology,
natural law,
sex differences,
virtue ethics,
virtues
Thursday, June 25, 2015
From Steubenville to University of Dallas
UD Announces New Constantin College Dean: Ethics Scholar Jonathan J. Sanford
Sanford is author of the recently published Before Ethics.
Sanford is author of the recently published Before Ethics.
Labels:
Aristotle,
CUA Press,
ethics,
people,
virtue ethics
Thursday, January 09, 2014
Studies in Christian Ethics: Andrew Louth, "Virtue Ethics: St Maximos the Confessor and Aquinas Compared" (pdf)
Aquinas distinguishes the cardinal virtues from the theologial virtues, as Louth points out, but he also distinguishes between the infused virtues and the acquired virtues, a distinction which is missed by Louth in his essay. The infused cardinal virtues are subordinate to the theological virtues (also infused) but they cannot be acquired through practice, though it would seem that they can be strengthened to practice. (Does St. Maximus make this distinction between infused and acquired virtues?) The infused cardinal virtues are distinguished from the theological virtues by reason, but united in exercise, through grace and charity. If Louth were to take this distinction between the infused and acquired virtues into account, how would his treatment of Aquinas differ?
Aquinas distinguishes the cardinal virtues from the theologial virtues, as Louth points out, but he also distinguishes between the infused virtues and the acquired virtues, a distinction which is missed by Louth in his essay. The infused cardinal virtues are subordinate to the theological virtues (also infused) but they cannot be acquired through practice, though it would seem that they can be strengthened to practice. (Does St. Maximus make this distinction between infused and acquired virtues?) The infused cardinal virtues are distinguished from the theological virtues by reason, but united in exercise, through grace and charity. If Louth were to take this distinction between the infused and acquired virtues into account, how would his treatment of Aquinas differ?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)