Tuesday, December 27, 2011
Monday, December 26, 2011
From the Spring 2011, volume 10, number 1 issue of Tidings:
Related:
Father Dumitru Staniloae:Orthodox Spirituality
Dumitru Staniloae: An Ecumenical Ecclesiology by Radu Bordeianu
His obituary in The Independent.
Second Liturgical institute Student Successfully Defends Doctoral Dissertation
On May 4th, 2011, Institute Student Fr. Anthony Putti successfully defended his doctoral dissertation, becoming the second graduate of the Liturgical Institute to complete the degree of Doctor of Sacred Theology. The culmination of five years of research and writing, his doctoral dissertation, entitled "Theosis Through Liturgy in the Theologies of Alexander Schmemann and Dumitru Staniloae," was written under the direction of faculty member Fr. Emery De Gaal.
Fr. Putti explained that the Eastern notion of theosis, often called divinization in the West, has strong biblical and patristic support, as in St. Athanasius' famous statement that God became man so that man might become God. In particular, the dissertation focused on comparing the understanding of theosis in two of the twentieth century's great Orthodox theologians.
Schmemann, who served for over 40 years at St. Vladimir's Seminary in New York, is known for his writings on the sacred liturgy, many of which have been available in English for decades. Fr. Putti argued that Schmemann's model saw the Church as the enablign agent of theosis through the sacred liturgy, making theosis the goal of the Christian life in God by the Holy Spirit.
The doctoral defense board spoke highly of Fr. Putti's introduction of the important work of Staniloae to the English-speaking world. A Romanian priest, Staniloae (1903-1993) proposed a mystical-dogmatic approach to theosis centered on the vision of God as three divine persons, envisioning the mystery of the Incarnation as the basis for the transfiguration of the entire cosmos.
The Liturgical Institute congratulates Fr. Putti for his careful academic work and intellectual rigor, and look forward to his scholarly contribution to the Church's liturgical life.
Related:
Father Dumitru Staniloae:Orthodox Spirituality
Dumitru Staniloae: An Ecumenical Ecclesiology by Radu Bordeianu
His obituary in The Independent.
Was about to finish some comments on a piece at The Public Discourse, but the website is down (or the account has been suspended)...
Sunday, December 25, 2011
Sandro Magister, Inside the Crisis. With the Society of Jesus
The analysis of the European financial disaster written by "La Civiltà Cattolica" with the approval of the Vatican secretariat of state. Special focus: Italy and Germany
The analysis of the European financial disaster written by "La Civiltà Cattolica" with the approval of the Vatican secretariat of state. Special focus: Italy and Germany
Saturday, December 24, 2011
Byzantine, Texas: Orthodoxy and Heterodoxy, an abbreviated review
What does doctrine matter, as long as you're a theist. Or you believe in God? (Or worse, as long as you believe something and are a good person?) But some forms of ignorance can be excused; the rejection of charity cannot. Non-Christians (apart from the Jews) know nothing about loving God more than one's self.
But back to dogma - what if God has revealed Himself to us? Shouldn't we then be concerned with what He has actually revealed, instead of relying upon our own possibly mistaken ideas?
(Isn't everyone's faith the same? Isn't all just tradition? But what is the ultimate source of the tradition? And what do we know through the tradition? How is Christianity set apart from Judaism and Islam on this point? I do not think Islam would claim that the object of faith for a Muslim is God Himself.)
What does doctrine matter, as long as you're a theist. Or you believe in God? (Or worse, as long as you believe something and are a good person?) But some forms of ignorance can be excused; the rejection of charity cannot. Non-Christians (apart from the Jews) know nothing about loving God more than one's self.
But back to dogma - what if God has revealed Himself to us? Shouldn't we then be concerned with what He has actually revealed, instead of relying upon our own possibly mistaken ideas?
(Isn't everyone's faith the same? Isn't all just tradition? But what is the ultimate source of the tradition? And what do we know through the tradition? How is Christianity set apart from Judaism and Islam on this point? I do not think Islam would claim that the object of faith for a Muslim is God Himself.)
Wednesday, December 21, 2011
Moral Absolutes and the Divine Command by Robert T. Miller
(see also God and Moral Absolutes by Matthew O'Brien)
(see also God and Moral Absolutes by Matthew O'Brien)
Labels:
Christopher O. Tollefsen,
ethics,
God,
the Natural Law
Tuesday, December 20, 2011
Thaddeus Kozinski has some posts over at ISI reviewing Sertillanges and his recommendations for cultivating the intellectual life.
Labels:
Dominicans,
Thaddeus Kozinski,
the intellectual life
Monday, December 19, 2011
No Intentional Killing of the Innocent: A Response to Miscamble and O’Brien by Christopher O. Tollefsen
Labels:
Christopher O. Tollefsen,
just war theory,
justice,
murder
Sunday, December 18, 2011
Saturday, December 17, 2011
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)