Showing posts with label Christology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Christology. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 28, 2024

Thomistic Christology

Sunday, May 23, 2021

Cur Deus Verba

Thursday, May 13, 2021

Douglas Farrow on the Ascension

Thursday, April 01, 2021

Mary: Co-Redemptrix?

Sunday, March 28, 2021

What Notion of Sacrifice?

Monday, February 22, 2021

Western Views of Christ as Mediator

A birfucation of the Divine Person of Christ, resulting in semi-Arianism?

Wednesday, November 25, 2020

Tuesday, October 27, 2020

There's a Trinitarian/Christological Heresy

Sunday, October 25, 2020

Following Fratelli Tutti's Lead

And its interpretation of the parable of the Good Samaritan.




Thursday, August 20, 2020

"Victim"



Etymoline:

victim (n.)

late 15c., "living creature killed and offered as a sacrifice to a deity or supernatural power, or in the performance of a religious rite;" from Latin victima "sacrificial animal; person or animal killed as a sacrifice," a word of uncertain origin. Perhaps related to vicis "turn, occasion" (as in vicarious), if the notion is an "exchange" with the gods. Perhaps distantly connected to Old English wig "idol," Gothic weihs "holy," German weihen "consecrate" (compare Weihnachten "Christmas") on notion of "a consecrated animal."
Sense of "person who is hurt, tortured, or killed by another" is recorded from 1650s; meaning "person oppressed by some power or situation, person ruined or greatly injured or made to suffer in the pursuit of an object, or for the gratification of a passion or infatuation, or from disease or disaster" is from 1718. Weaker sense of "person taken advantage of, one who is cheated or duped" is recorded from 1781.
WordSense.EU
Wiktionary

U. Pitt Keywords Project:

Keyword: Victim

Victim is an important word because it links often traumatic personal or group experiences in contemporary societies to frameworks that understand such experiences and respond to them through public policy, political advocacy, and in wider public debate. The etymology of victim is straightforward: the word comes from Latin victima. Its first sense is that of a sacrificial offering, and this strong sense is made stronger by the identification of the sacrificial offering and thus the victim as Christ. By C17, however, it has developed the more general meaning “a person who is put to death or subjected to torture by another; one who suffers severely in body or property through cruel or oppressive treatment.” These strong meanings developed into a general sense of a passive recipient of misfortune. While in earlier uses such misfortune has been regarded as individual or random, there has been a concerted attempt in recent years to use the word as a route to political empowerment as the status of victim becomes structural. Governments have also chosen to endow victims with an active role in addressing their misfortune; this is most evident in some criminal justice systems, where the issue then arises of whether such victims have been given a power to override not only the rights of offenders but also the ability of the state itself to administer justice.

Wednesday, August 19, 2020

The Byzantine View of the Incarnation



Thursday, July 02, 2020

A Response to Latin Trads

But still making use of a Latin notion of sacrifice.

CLJ

Sunday, April 19, 2020

Jesse Billett: An Anglican Liturgist Reflects on Eastern and Oriental Orthodox Reunion





His presentation reminded me of the sad events of Church history. In the past some Latin polemicists have faulted the heresy, or laxity, or even their rebelliousness with respect to Rome of Eastern Christians for their being conquered by Muslims. What if the chastisement was not for these reasons but for failures in charity, first in the relations between the Byzantine Christians and the non-Chalcedonian Christians (or Orthodox)? And later, there were failures in charity by those ruling the Eastern Roman, or "Byzantine," Empire and possibly even those holding authority in the Byzantine churches...

Tuesday, March 03, 2020

A Product of Western "Semi-Arianism"?

For contemporary monothelites, by contrast, Jesus’s humanity is firmly in the driver’s seat. To the extent that we may say that Jesus is divine, this is at best a secondary claim, derived from the historical Jesus, the product of a scientific quest.

First Things: Jesus: Less Than Divine by Hans Boersma

Thursday, May 09, 2019