Showing posts with label ecclesial authority. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ecclesial authority. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 03, 2024

Theology of Education

With what competence, experience, or wisdom to gather doxa and present them as tenets?

Thursday, August 22, 2024

Gelasian Dyarchy Still a Thing for Some

Thursday, May 16, 2024

Maybe

Wednesday, August 25, 2021

Philip Lawler on Conscientious Objection to Vaccination

Friday, June 11, 2021

I Will Have to Read the Actual Condemnation of Action Française



Was there actual heresy involved?

Monday, June 07, 2021

Sanctions by Whom?

Who wields "authority" to sanction these offenders, presbyteral or episcopal?

Sunday, February 21, 2021

Maybe the Faithful Should Be Doing More than Praying

Wednesday, February 03, 2021

The Implications of the Sensus Fidelium

Tuesday, February 02, 2021

Two-Pronged Attack

But Latins have already capitulated to feminism; how can they resist the latest from feminists? For too long they relied on institutional scale and now they will suffer the consequences of a church of numbers.

Wednesday, December 30, 2020

Deserving of a Popular Cult

And the modern Roman saint-making machine wasn't involved in his canonization so there's that for the credibility of the cult.

But this is a take that will be unpopular among the Latin integralists: St. Thomas Becket was a victim of a theology of ecclesial authority that hadn't been fully worked out and yet was nonetheless asserted and practiced as dogma. Was a conflict between a Christian secular authority (especially in the form of a over-grasping monarchy) and ecclesial authority inevitable? Probably. Could it have been resolved by other means? What if the Church had not assisted in the development of Christian monarchy in the first place, and had chosen a different path?

I found this post from The Josias which perfectly reflects how St. Thomas Becket wouuld be portrayed by Latin integralists:

Wednesday, November 25, 2020

A Proper Role for the Universal Primate?



A localist, communion-ecclesiological understanding of jurisdiction would focus more on the people seeking to have a presbyter/bishop of their own rite petitioning for acceptance from the Christian majority of a different rite who live in an area? (Not that the majority would have a right to reject their request, but a request out of charity and politeness protocol/etiquette.) And the local presbyteral synod would welcome the new presbyter/bishop to their synod. Something like that...

Tuesday, November 24, 2020

Two I Will Have to Revisit



Monday, November 16, 2020

But Do Bishops Really have This Authority?



OT practices and legislation may not be a good foundation for arguing that such an authority exists for Christian presbyters and bishops.

Sunday, November 08, 2020

Byzantine Triumphalism

How much more do they have to lose before they learn the lesson? Lord have mercy. All jurisdictions will have to re-evaluate their notions of primacy and ecclesial authority before there can be full reconciliation. Matthew 20:25.

Friday, October 16, 2020

Pope Innocent III and the Growth of the Papacy



Medievalists.net

Wednesday, September 16, 2020

The Roman Position

Saturday, August 29, 2020

Jeff Mirus on Latin Integralism



Recognizing that the Church is the arbiter not only of Divine Revelation but of what God reveals through creation in what we call the Natural Law, I am more inclined to want to get the natural law right, to study Catholic social teaching with great care, and to develop a political party that combines the best and most comprehensive recognition of the corresponding principles that ought to animate both the social order and government itself.

Latins claim this as a part of the authority of the Church (see CCC 2036 and Dignitatis Humane 14), but where is the warrant within Apostolic Tradition? Setting aside those secondary precepts which are not directly directly through reasoning but are determined by reason or are applications of reason in finding a convention to order some state of affairs (e.g. driving on which side of the road), there are several points to be made.

1. There are precepts of Natural Law that have nonetheless been revealed directly by God as well. These have been passed down as a part of Sacred Tradition. So bishops can be said to be arbiters of the Natural Law, in so far as they have received it as a part of God's revelation to Israel and in Christ. But does that revelation include all possible secondary precepts?
2. Knowing apart from Divine Revelation the "fullness" of the Natural Law requires not intellectual virtue but moral virtue. Do bishops have a special charism from the Holy Spirit that replaces the need for this and the habit of synderesis and the logical reasoning required as well? This is a more dubious claim.

That the Church possesses the authority to teach the precepts of the Natural Law is probably a long-standing Latin theological opinion. (Going back to Trent if not some time before, during the medieval period?) I'd like to read a treatise or manual that show some nuance in presenting this. Can the patriarchate of Rome cite one of its "ecumenical councils" as an authority espousing this opinon? I am doubtful, since the CCC makes no such reference.

See the old CE entry on the Natural Law.

Wednesday, July 22, 2020

An Integralist Response to Dante