Message for the 2012 World Tourism Day
"Along this way, the energy problems have to be taken into due consideration. It is an erroneous assumption to think that “an infinite quantity of energy and resources are available, that it is possible to renew them quickly, and that the negative effects of the exploitation of the natural order can be easily absorbed”.[3]"
All very diplomatic, no talk about re-engaging simplicity.
Tuesday, July 24, 2012
Monday, July 23, 2012
James Hannam lecture
James Hannam, The Genesis of Science: How the Christian Middle Ages Launched the Scientific Revolution
Related:
Walter Pannenberg, The Historicity of Nature: Essays on Science and Theology
Alexei V. Nesteruk, Light from the East: Theology, Science, and the Eastern Orthodox Tradition
Labels:
books,
intellectual history,
philosophy of science
Friday, July 20, 2012
Thursday, July 19, 2012
Wednesday, July 18, 2012
Tuesday, July 17, 2012
Ite Ad Thomam: The Best Manual on Ascetical and Mystical Theology (Free Download)
Royo Marin, Antonio - Teologia de La Perfeccion Cristiana 01
Royo Marin, Antonio - Teologia de La Perfeccion Cristiana 01
Labels:
books,
Christian spirituality,
Dominicans,
moral theology
Monday, July 16, 2012
Sunday, July 15, 2012
Rome Reports: Benedict XVI currently finishing book on Jesus of Nazareth
A visit to the Grand Mosque of Rome
Friday, July 13, 2012
Culture Wars: The Sad Story of Thomism in America
Florian Michel, La pensée catholique en Amérique du Nord: Réseaux intellectuels et échanges culturels entre l'Europe, le Canada et les Etats-Unis (Desclée de Brouwer Paris, 2010).
Reviewed by Joseph Filipowicz
The book itself might be worth reading; the review is ok, though it does not talk much about De Koninck. But at the end the reviewer slips into the a rather extreme "traditionalism" in how he views the American founding:
I do think Maritain may have been too optimistic and misjudged how reconcilable liberalism and "modern liberal democracy" are with Catholicism. Part of this is probably due to erroneous assumptions concerning the modern nation-state and whether it is at the proper scale to bring about the common good, even if we abstract from historical considerations about how it came to be and the forces that were at work. He probably accepted the Yankee narrative and its understanding of the Constitution, too.
Florian Michel, La pensée catholique en Amérique du Nord: Réseaux intellectuels et échanges culturels entre l'Europe, le Canada et les Etats-Unis (Desclée de Brouwer Paris, 2010).
Reviewed by Joseph Filipowicz
The book itself might be worth reading; the review is ok, though it does not talk much about De Koninck. But at the end the reviewer slips into the a rather extreme "traditionalism" in how he views the American founding:
And what is the response of the other Catholic leaders? It is to continue the project of Maritain, with the Hispanics of the 2010s playing the role that the Polish played in the 1930s-1970s. We are told that there are two traditions present in the United States, that of the Protestant Puritans and that of the Catholic Hispanics. Both of the traditions are good leading to the highest development of democratic freedom, and, in the end, the tradition of democratic freedom stems from the same font, the wisdom of Aquinas. Once both of them figure this out, American will become good and whole again.
This position, which descends from the thought of Maritain, should now be seen for what it truly is, namely, preposterous. The Protestant Puritans were radicals who were rebelling against a group of rebels that were rebelling against the Catholic Faith. The American Founding Fathers were a new set of rebels who had descended from the Puritan rebels. The American Protestants and Jewish elites that came together to form higher Judeo-Protestant American Culture at the end of the 20th Century were together forming a new form of subversive and revolutionary culture. The likes of Dewey, Wirth, Blanshard, and their leftist and neoconservative progeny do not see any possibility of compromise with Catholic culture unless the Catholics are willing to change their system of morals so that they would embrace birth control, war, individualism, capitalism or any other of the modern materialist ideologies stemming from the 18th Century.
I do think Maritain may have been too optimistic and misjudged how reconcilable liberalism and "modern liberal democracy" are with Catholicism. Part of this is probably due to erroneous assumptions concerning the modern nation-state and whether it is at the proper scale to bring about the common good, even if we abstract from historical considerations about how it came to be and the forces that were at work. He probably accepted the Yankee narrative and its understanding of the Constitution, too.
Thursday, July 12, 2012
Rome Reports on the St. Augustine production
From 2 years ago, when the miniseries first came out in Italy/Europe?
Ite Ad Thomam: Video Conversation with Fr. Cekada on The Ottaviani Intervention
Ottaviani Intervention
Will someone write a biography of Cardinal Ottaviani?
In an advertisement for the publication of Yves Congar's journal written during the Second Vatican Council, a part of the entry for Tuesday 6 November 1962 is given: "At 6 pm, I called on Cardinal Frings: he had asked me to come. Ratzinger, Jedin and Rahner were there too. Purpose of the meeting: to see how to go about proposing the Rahner-Ratzinger texts in place of the existing dogmatic schemas."
It would be great if someday those schemas were publicly available for review.
A progressive take on the cardinal: How the Order of Deacons Was Restored to the Roman Church
A Time article from 1979: Religion: A Cardinal Carabiniere
Ottaviani Intervention
Will someone write a biography of Cardinal Ottaviani?
In an advertisement for the publication of Yves Congar's journal written during the Second Vatican Council, a part of the entry for Tuesday 6 November 1962 is given: "At 6 pm, I called on Cardinal Frings: he had asked me to come. Ratzinger, Jedin and Rahner were there too. Purpose of the meeting: to see how to go about proposing the Rahner-Ratzinger texts in place of the existing dogmatic schemas."
It would be great if someday those schemas were publicly available for review.
A progressive take on the cardinal: How the Order of Deacons Was Restored to the Roman Church
A Time article from 1979: Religion: A Cardinal Carabiniere
Labels:
books,
CDF,
Joseph Ratzinger,
Vatican II,
Yves Congar OP
Wednesday, July 11, 2012
Monday, July 09, 2012
Metropolitan Jonah tenders resignation
Holy Synod appoints Archbishop Nathaniel Locum Tenens, Bishop Michael Temporary Administrator
Some videos:
Metropolitan Jonah Historic ROCOR Visit, Clip 1
OCA Metropolitan Jonah Homily at St. John's ROCOR in Mayfield
Divine Liturgy by OCA and ROCOR Primates on the Feast of the Kursk Root Icon
Holy Synod appoints Archbishop Nathaniel Locum Tenens, Bishop Michael Temporary Administrator
Some videos:
Metropolitan Jonah Historic ROCOR Visit, Clip 1
OCA Metropolitan Jonah Homily at St. John's ROCOR in Mayfield
Divine Liturgy by OCA and ROCOR Primates on the Feast of the Kursk Root Icon
Sunday, July 08, 2012
For the Peace from Above'... (lecture) Metropolitan Kallistos Ware
Also from last year:
Related:
Fr. Dumitru Staniloae - Essence of Christianity
Saturday, July 07, 2012
Friday, July 06, 2012
Thursday, July 05, 2012
Higgs Boson
No Thomistic commentary on the "particle" in question? Seems like it would be an easy dialectical target.
CERN intro
Lab
CERN intro
Lab
The Higgs Boson Explained from PHD Comics on Vimeo.
The Atlantic Why the Higgs Boson Discovery Is Disappointing, According to the Smartest Man in the World Hyperphysics WIREDWednesday, July 04, 2012
Video of Hieromonk Gabriel Bunge
Ieroschimonahul ortodox Gabriel Bunge la Cluj Napoca noiembrie 2011- ASCOR Cluj part. 1
Part 2 Despite his becoming Orthodox, his book Earthen Vessels is still useful to Catholics.
Part 2 Despite his becoming Orthodox, his book Earthen Vessels is still useful to Catholics.
Zenit: Papal Address to Delegation from the Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople
Venerable brothers, in our meeting today, while we entrust to the intercession of the glorious Apostles and Martyrs Peter and Paul our prayer, so that the Lord, rich in mercy, will grant us to arrive soon the blessed day in which we will be able to share the Eucharistic table, we raise our voices in a hymn of praise to God for the path of peace and reconciliation that He gives us to follow together. This year marks the 50th anniversary of the opening of the Vatican II Ecumenical Council, which will be celebrated solemnly next October 11. It is in fact in concomitance with this Council, at which, as you well know, some representatives of the Ecumenical Patriarchate were present in the capacity of fraternal Delegates, that a new and important phase began of relations between our Churches. We wish to praise the Lord first of all for the rediscovery of the profound fraternity that binds us, and also for the path followed in these years by the Mixed International Commission for Theological Dialogue between the Catholic Church and the Orthodox Church as a whole, with the hope that in the present phase progress will also be made.
Recalling the anniversary of Vatican Council II, it seems fitting to me to recall the figure and activity of the unforgettable Ecumenical Patriarch Athenagoras, of whom will be observed in a few days the 40th anniversary of his death. Patriarch Athenagoras, together with Blessed Pope John XXIII and the Servant of God Paul VI, animated by that passion for the unity of the Church springing from faith in Christ the Lord, were promoters of courageous initiatives that opened the way to renew relations between the Ecumenical Patriarchate and the Catholic Church. It is a motive of particular joy for me to see how His Holiness Bartholomew I follows, with renewed fidelity and fecund creativity, the path traced by his Predecessors the Patriarchs Athenagoras and Dimitrios, distinguishing himself at the international level for his openness to the dialogue between Christians and for his commitment to the service of proclaiming the Gospel in the contemporary world.
Tuesday, July 03, 2012
Monday, July 02, 2012
New Head of the CDF - Bad News?
Poacher turned gamekeeper put in charge of Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith
kreuz.net – Ein hartgesottener Ketzer wird Präfekt der Glaubenskongregation\
Gerhard Ludwig Müller for the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith
Edit. Fr. Z's blog entry
kreuz.net – Ein hartgesottener Ketzer wird Präfekt der Glaubenskongregation\
Gerhard Ludwig Müller for the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith
Edit. Fr. Z's blog entry
Sunday, July 01, 2012
NCRegister Interview with Archbishop Di Noia
Rorate Caeli: For the record: Important interview with Ecclesia Dei VP Di Noia
"The Pope doesn't want this division to continue"
The NCR interview.
Jordi Savall/HesperionXX -Maria matrem virginem
The complete video for Friday's liturgy for the feast of Saints Peter and Paul.
"The Pope doesn't want this division to continue"
The NCR interview.
Jordi Savall/HesperionXX -Maria matrem virginem
The complete video for Friday's liturgy for the feast of Saints Peter and Paul.
Labels:
Augustine Di Noia OP,
Benedict XVI,
sacred music,
SSPX
Saturday, June 30, 2012
Did I post a link to this lecture by Fr. Spitzer(?) on God and Modern Physics? I have not yet watched it, but I assume that like many contemporary Catholic apologists, he accepts contemporary cosmology as a premise for his argument.
Magis Center of Reason and Faith
Why Modern Physics Point to God
Related:
Dr. Paul L. Gavrilyuk
Associate Professor of Historical Theology
faculty page
alt
Magis Center of Reason and Faith
Why Modern Physics Point to God
Related:
Dr. Paul L. Gavrilyuk
Associate Professor of Historical Theology
faculty page
alt
Friday, June 29, 2012
Predictions About Fr. Rhonheimer's New Book
The Common Good of Constitutional Democracy
Essays in Political Philosophy and on Catholic Social Teaching
Martin Rhonheimer
Edited by William F. Murphy
1. It presupposes the modern nation-state as the starting point.
2. The definition of common good will be inadequate because he does not address the question of scale.
3. The question of scale in relation to the form of government will not be addressed as well.
I am curious as to what he has to say about multiculturalism.
Another post on forthcoming titles shortly.
Essays in Political Philosophy and on Catholic Social Teaching
Martin Rhonheimer
Edited by William F. Murphy
1. It presupposes the modern nation-state as the starting point.
2. The definition of common good will be inadequate because he does not address the question of scale.
3. The question of scale in relation to the form of government will not be addressed as well.
I am curious as to what he has to say about multiculturalism.
Another post on forthcoming titles shortly.
Labels:
books,
common good,
CUA Press,
Martin Rhonheimer,
politike
Thursday, June 28, 2012
Thaddeus Kozinski recommends...
Liberty, the God That Failed
Policing the Sacred and Constructing the Myths of the Secular State, from Locke to Obama
Christopher A. Ferrara
Along with: On the Road to Emmaus by Glenn Olsen
The first seems to be what one might expect for a traditionalist critique of the American political order, explicating the source of its principles being solely the Enlightenment and liberalism.
Liberty, the God That Failed
Policing the Sacred and Constructing the Myths of the Secular State, from Locke to Obama
Christopher A. Ferrara
Along with: On the Road to Emmaus by Glenn Olsen
The first seems to be what one might expect for a traditionalist critique of the American political order, explicating the source of its principles being solely the Enlightenment and liberalism.
Zenit: Archbishop Nichols: What Does Human Dignity Really Mean?
London Prelate Considers History, Present Relevance of Key Concept
Cicero, Augustine, and Aquinas? Aquinas distinguishes between various sorts of dignity. What of Cicero and Augustine?
London Prelate Considers History, Present Relevance of Key Concept
Archbishop Nichols observed that the idea of human dignity has a long history, going back to Cicero, Augustine and Aquinas. It was further developed by the Salamanca school of Dominicans in Spain at the time of the colonization of America. Subsequently, during the last century or so, it has been the topic of the social encyclicals of the Church.
Human dignity also has great importance outside the Church, he added. The UN Declaration of Human Rights, in Article 1 states: “All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.”
He also noted that Article 1 (1) of the German Basic law, also drafted in 1948, states that “human dignity is inviolable. To respect it and protect it is the duty of all state power”.
Cicero, Augustine, and Aquinas? Aquinas distinguishes between various sorts of dignity. What of Cicero and Augustine?
An interview with Freeman Dyson
Counterpunch: An Interview With Freeman Dyson on the Origins of Life on Earth by SUZAN MAZUR
His homepage.
More:
Heretical Thoughts About Science and Society
NYT: The Civil Heretic
TED profile
His homepage.
More:
Heretical Thoughts About Science and Society
NYT: The Civil Heretic
TED profile
Labels:
biology,
materialism,
philosophy of science,
physics,
scientism
Wednesday, June 27, 2012
More from the Science and Faith Conference
Edward Feser & Jonathan Sanford - Science and Faith Conference
Stephen Barr & Alexander Sich - Science and Faith Conference
Michael Behe & Daniel Kuebler - Science and Faith Conference
Jay Richards & Mark Ryland - Science and Faith Conference
(How is the Institute for the Study of Nature doing?)
More from FUS.
Unfortunately, no video is available for Dr. Carroll's presentation? (There is video of the response.) But I did find the following:
William Carroll: Darwin in the 21st Century: Nature, Humanity, and God
William Carroll: "The Scientific Revolution and Discourse on Science-and-Religion"
Stephen Barr & Alexander Sich - Science and Faith Conference
Michael Behe & Daniel Kuebler - Science and Faith Conference
Jay Richards & Mark Ryland - Science and Faith Conference
(How is the Institute for the Study of Nature doing?)
More from FUS.
Unfortunately, no video is available for Dr. Carroll's presentation? (There is video of the response.) But I did find the following:
William Carroll: Darwin in the 21st Century: Nature, Humanity, and God
William Carroll: "The Scientific Revolution and Discourse on Science-and-Religion"
Brad Gregory "Against Nostalgia: Catholicism, History, and Modernity."
Brad Gregory "Against Nostalgia: Catholicism, History, and Modernity." from The Lumen Christi Institute on Vimeo.
Tuesday, June 26, 2012
Ite ad Thomam: Announcing a New Master's Program in Scholastic Philosophy (Institute Catholique de Toulouse)
What's going on with the Society of Scholastics?
What's going on with the Society of Scholastics?
Via Dominican Vocations: "The Holy Father has nominated His Excellency, Archbishop Joseph Augustine Di Noia, O.P., until now Secretary of the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments, to be the Vice President of the Pontifical Commission “Ecclesia Dei.”"
Rorate Caeli: Di Noia to CNS: "Possible to have theological disagreements and be in communion" - "Can't read Vatican II texts from the viewpoint of liberals who were in the Council"
Diary from Vatican II by Father Robert Barron (on Yves Congar's journal)
Rorate Caeli: Di Noia to CNS: "Possible to have theological disagreements and be in communion" - "Can't read Vatican II texts from the viewpoint of liberals who were in the Council"
Diary from Vatican II by Father Robert Barron (on Yves Congar's journal)
Labels:
Augustine Di Noia OP,
Vatican II,
Yves Congar OP
Sunday, June 24, 2012
Changes in the Curia
Levada is to resign from the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, leaving Müller in pole position to substitute him. Meanwhile, the Vatican library is getting a new librarian and Bertone’s substitution appears imminent
ANDREA TORNIELLI
Levada is to resign from the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, leaving Müller in pole position to substitute him. Meanwhile, the Vatican library is getting a new librarian and Bertone’s substitution appears imminent
ANDREA TORNIELLI
Augustinian Localism?
Augustinian Reflections on Love and Localism by A.J. DeBonis
I still need to read through City of God all the way through...
I still need to read through City of God all the way through...
Saturday, June 23, 2012
Restless Heart
Ignatius Press announces forthcoming release of the film, "Restless Heart"
Another dubbed foreign movie. Accurate with respect to the details and costumes?
Another dubbed foreign movie. Accurate with respect to the details and costumes?
Fr. Z: Of Beer, Norcia, Monks, Boars, Cheese, Truffles and the City of God
Birra Nursia! Coming to BevMo? Sarge might go visit Norcia if he has some time. No time for France (or Le Barroux).
The Benedictines of the Immaculate continue to update their blog.
Birra Nursia! Coming to BevMo? Sarge might go visit Norcia if he has some time. No time for France (or Le Barroux).
The Benedictines of the Immaculate continue to update their blog.
Christopher J. Malloy, Objections to the Summa's Structure
Joseph G. Trabbic, Is the Summa Structurally Flawed?
One may read criticisms of the Summa that it is too rationalistic in its theology; I recall reading this objection from Orthodox apologists as well. The Summa presupposes the Creed; could there be a scientific exposition of the Trinity without a exposition of the unity of God?
Joseph G. Trabbic, Is the Summa Structurally Flawed?
One may read criticisms of the Summa that it is too rationalistic in its theology; I recall reading this objection from Orthodox apologists as well. The Summa presupposes the Creed; could there be a scientific exposition of the Trinity without a exposition of the unity of God?
Thursday, June 21, 2012
Zenit: Holy See on Sustainable Development
"Human beings, in fact, come first. We need to be reminded of this"
"Human beings, in fact, come first. We need to be reminded of this"
Wednesday, June 20, 2012
Tuesday, June 19, 2012
Monday, June 18, 2012
Sunday, June 17, 2012
The Theological Origin and, Hopefully, End of Modernity by Thaddeus J. Kozinski
The question of modernity, again. Kozinski offers a couple of scenarios as to how this all plays out, but I think maybe the analysis starts off on the wrong foot. Was there a rebellion against the authority of the Church? Undoubtedly. Did that rebellion provide the intellectual roots for liberalism? Or merely the occasion for it to develop as a reaction against the wars of religion?
Maybe it is not "modernity" that is the problem, but the power of earthly rulers vying against God; they are the ones who have made of liberalism and a host of other idealogies in order to take power for themselves in the name of liberating the masses.
Voluntarism, an indifferent will as primary moral agent; nominalism, the rejection of any real reference for universal concepts; disenchantment, the default existential mode of a buffered, self-sufficient “individual”; and desacralization, the “immanent frame” surrounding and conditioning modern social and intellectual life—these were the background assumptions of the Enlightenment, but they seem now foregrounded social, cultural, and political dogmas. The “Regensburg Address” of the Pope, with his account of the three waves of dehellenization, is, I think, a key text for grasping this development. Dehellenized reason closed to intelligible being, a voluntarist God beyond good and evil, a non-participatory cosmos mechanically construed, and a univocal, flattened concept of being supplanting Aquinas’ precarious but precious metaphysics of analogy—these are the metaphysical, epistemological, and theological roots of modernity, and they are deeply planted. As the Pope suggests, these roots have nourished a misshapen cultural tree, nay, a forest; and it cannot be simply cut down and replanted—for it is our home, whether we like our home or not, for, at least for the time being, there is no other domestic domicile into which to move, it would seem.
Now, great fruits came via their heroic attempts: the progress of medicine and human rights; what Taylor calls the “affirmation of ordinary life”; the dignity of persons seen as ends and never means (Casanova); the autonomy of politics, science, and economics from ecclesial control. This represents, as in the words of Maritain, a maturation of the political order and the Gospel seed coming to fruition. This is the true message of Gaudium et spes, when interpreted correctly–that is, not as a replacement of the Syllabus of Errors, but its complement. After Vatican II, no Catholic can interpret the prior social teaching and theology as simply a rejection of modernity, but neither can they reject or dismiss the prior teaching as outdated or simply mistaken.
The question of modernity, again. Kozinski offers a couple of scenarios as to how this all plays out, but I think maybe the analysis starts off on the wrong foot. Was there a rebellion against the authority of the Church? Undoubtedly. Did that rebellion provide the intellectual roots for liberalism? Or merely the occasion for it to develop as a reaction against the wars of religion?
Maybe it is not "modernity" that is the problem, but the power of earthly rulers vying against God; they are the ones who have made of liberalism and a host of other idealogies in order to take power for themselves in the name of liberating the masses.
Saturday, June 16, 2012
Will it be possible for a sinner to deny the justice of God's judgment on the Last Day? The damned know that they have sinned and why they are damned. Even if his mind is illuminated or he is convicted by his own conscience, is it possible for him to deny that God's judgment and punishment is just, to lie to himself on these two points, to affirm that their punishment is undeserved? After all, our judgment can be distorted by a bad will.
(Aquinas does not cover this question in his discussion of the will and intellect of the damned.)
It seems that the damned know they have sinned and that they have rejected God in sinning, and that their punishment, being deprived of the beatific vision or union with God, is appropriate, since they do not want this. But what of the poena sensus? "Why doesn't God just leave me alone? Why is He so petty?" And yet the poena sensus is a just punishment for the sins themselves. Is this undeniable?
(Aquinas on the punishment of the damned)
Does God preserve those who sin in the state of ignorance so that their conscience will not convict them? That seems like wishful thinking.
A related question regarding knowledge:
Titus 3:10-11
10 A man that is a heretic, after the first and second admonition, avoid: 11 Knowing that he, that is such an one, is subverted, and sinneth, being condemned by his own judgment.
God gives us the grace to assent to authority? Can there be obstacles to our recognition that someone holds authority within the Church, if we have been baptized and raised in the Church?
When are we justified in rejecting someone who verbally expresses rejection of God and His Church or the Church's teaching authority?
(Aquinas does not cover this question in his discussion of the will and intellect of the damned.)
It seems that the damned know they have sinned and that they have rejected God in sinning, and that their punishment, being deprived of the beatific vision or union with God, is appropriate, since they do not want this. But what of the poena sensus? "Why doesn't God just leave me alone? Why is He so petty?" And yet the poena sensus is a just punishment for the sins themselves. Is this undeniable?
(Aquinas on the punishment of the damned)
Does God preserve those who sin in the state of ignorance so that their conscience will not convict them? That seems like wishful thinking.
A related question regarding knowledge:
Titus 3:10-11
10 A man that is a heretic, after the first and second admonition, avoid: 11 Knowing that he, that is such an one, is subverted, and sinneth, being condemned by his own judgment.
God gives us the grace to assent to authority? Can there be obstacles to our recognition that someone holds authority within the Church, if we have been baptized and raised in the Church?
When are we justified in rejecting someone who verbally expresses rejection of God and His Church or the Church's teaching authority?
Friday, June 15, 2012
Not Understanding Nothing
A review of A Universe from Nothing
Edward Feser
Oxford Handbook of Aquinas
A review of A Universe from Nothing
Edward Feser
Oxford Handbook of Aquinas
Labels:
books,
Edward Feser,
philosophy of science,
physics,
St. Thomas Aquinas
Thursday, June 14, 2012
Wednesday, June 13, 2012
Lee Faber, Note on Some Translations of Scotus
I relied more on the English translation by Wolter for studying Scotus than on the original Latin.
I relied more on the English translation by Wolter for studying Scotus than on the original Latin.
MOJ: "Much Ado About Subsidiarity" (which links to this post at VN, which notably does not offer a definition of the common good, but one assumes that the one current in CST is implied). Garnett cites Russell Hittinger for an explanation of subsidiarity, and Hittinger adequately presents contemporary teaching on the concept. What is missing, to circumscribe the definition of subsidiarity and the state? A notion of the common good (life in community) that is tied to an understanding of the proper human scale.
If the common goods that exist at different "levels" do not have the same definition, then how can there be an ordered hierarchy of authorities serving them? If common good1 is not a part of common good 2, then how can authority1 be subordinate to authority2? An authority that serves to preserve the peace of many communities cannot have any sort of authority over the communities themselves - this would go beyond its competence.
If the common goods that exist at different "levels" do not have the same definition, then how can there be an ordered hierarchy of authorities serving them? If common good1 is not a part of common good 2, then how can authority1 be subordinate to authority2? An authority that serves to preserve the peace of many communities cannot have any sort of authority over the communities themselves - this would go beyond its competence.
Labels:
common good,
community,
politike,
Russell Hittinger,
subsidiarity
Tuesday, June 12, 2012
I was going through old mail and found a solicitation for Spiritual Life: A Journal of Contemporary Spirituality. Apparently the magazine is still in existence. Is the mass media format of the magazine or journal amenable to teaching about the spiritual life? Or shouldn't it deserve more of an extended treatment? (Or even better, a living guide?) Not everything can be disseminated through the mass media well.
Catholic Church Conservation: Dominican Monks Dance Like Lady Gaga
Good-natured fun, or a display of immaturity and the lack of good judgment? Despite discernment to the priesthood or religious life being postponed until much later in life, has the infantilization that plagues mass industrial 'cultures' affected our seminarians and young adults as well? Fortunately there are not more videos of seminarians doing goofy things - the Star Wars video is still up, though. (Those discerning religious life may be more mature, in so far as it is more demanding than the seminary.)
(How much of this might be due to contemporary "psychology," the need to have a personality and such, versus acquiring virtues nad properly fulfilling a function in caritas and community?)
Something from an older Dominican, fr Wojciech Giertych OP:
Papal Theologian on the 'Pange Lingua'
Good-natured fun, or a display of immaturity and the lack of good judgment? Despite discernment to the priesthood or religious life being postponed until much later in life, has the infantilization that plagues mass industrial 'cultures' affected our seminarians and young adults as well? Fortunately there are not more videos of seminarians doing goofy things - the Star Wars video is still up, though. (Those discerning religious life may be more mature, in so far as it is more demanding than the seminary.)
(How much of this might be due to contemporary "psychology," the need to have a personality and such, versus acquiring virtues nad properly fulfilling a function in caritas and community?)
Something from an older Dominican, fr Wojciech Giertych OP:
Papal Theologian on the 'Pange Lingua'
Labels:
Dominicans,
St. Thomas Aquinas,
Wojciech Giertych OP
Monday, June 11, 2012
Sunday, June 10, 2012
Saturday, June 09, 2012
Rome Reports: Convents and monasteries survive on their online stores
What are they going to do as the price of oil goes up higher? They need to start adjusting now.
What are they going to do as the price of oil goes up higher? They need to start adjusting now.
Friday, June 08, 2012
Mattias Caro, Is There Such a Thing as Inalienable Rights?. He refers to Rights You Can't Give Away.
Do we need to take Jefferson's rhetoric (or his theory of rights) so seriously?
Do we need to take Jefferson's rhetoric (or his theory of rights) so seriously?
James Chastek, Integral truth
Mr. Chastek compares theological truth with food and relates both to multiple ends. G-L is making a point though about the epistemology of those supporting the development of a new, up-to-date theology. If theology is not true, then how can it benefit or aid modern man and his vexations? Do we know God via things? Or do we know God through our ideas?
We could also ask the question of whether theology is more speculative or practical in nature.
Mr. Chastek compares theological truth with food and relates both to multiple ends. G-L is making a point though about the epistemology of those supporting the development of a new, up-to-date theology. If theology is not true, then how can it benefit or aid modern man and his vexations? Do we know God via things? Or do we know God through our ideas?
We could also ask the question of whether theology is more speculative or practical in nature.
Labels:
good,
James Chastek,
Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange,
theology
Thursday, June 07, 2012
Zenit: Papal Address to Civil Leaders of Milan, Lombardy
"Freedom is Not a Privilege for Some, but a Right for All"
Some notes:
There is another element that we can find in St. Ambrose’s teaching. Justice is the first quality of those who rule. Justice is the public virtue par excellence, because it has to do with the good of the whole community. [This would correspond to the legal justice of Aristotle and St. Thomas. Is this how it is defined by St. Ambrose?] And yet it is not enough. Ambrose sets another quality alongside it: love of freedom, which he considers a criterion for discerning between good and bad rulers, since, as we read in another of this letters: “the good love freedom, the wicked love servitude” (Epistula 40, 2). [The classical or Roman conception of liberty?] Freedom is not a privilege for some, but a right for all, a precious right that civil authority must guarantee. Nevertheless, freedom does not mean the arbitrary choice of the individual, but implies rather responsibility of everyone. Here we find one of the principal elements of the secularity of the state: assure freedom so that everyone can propose their vision of common life, always, however, with respect for the other and in the context of laws that aim at the good of all. [This is rather bizarre - how many different visions of the common life can there be? There is only the good of community, living together. What may be disputed are the means (or the laws) by which this is to be preserved or enhanced. Or is the Holy Father thinking of the modern nation-state, which is arguably not a community? It would seem so --]
On the other hand, the extent to which the conception of a confessional state is left behind, it appears clear that, in any case, the laws must find their justification and force in natural law, which is order adequate to the dignity of the human person, overcoming a merely positivist conception from which it is not possible to derive precepts that are, in some way, of an ethical character (cf. Speech to the German Parliament, Sept. 22, 2011). The state is at the service of and protects the person and his “well-being” in its multiple aspects, beginning with the right to life, the deliberate suppression of which is never permissible. Everyone can see then how legislation and the work of state institutions must be especially in the service of the family, founded on marriage and open to life, and how there must be a recognition of the primary right of the parents to freely educate and form their children, according to the educational plan that they judge valid and pertinent. The family is not treated justly if the state does not support the freedom of education for the common good of society as a whole. [So is the modern conception of the "state" problematic? How does it expand upon the notions of government and authority? We can say government should serve the common good, the community and its members. Personalist formulations of political science are not irreconcilable with earlier formulations. One must examine what a personalist says about the good of community and whether it is higher than the private good of the individual. While the "modern" notion of the state may have been formulated by certain writers during the 16th and 17th centuries, their definition(s) may not apply to every instance of the word. It depends on the author's intention, which should be made clear in the text or in his corpus of writings at least.]
"Freedom is Not a Privilege for Some, but a Right for All"
Some notes:
There is another element that we can find in St. Ambrose’s teaching. Justice is the first quality of those who rule. Justice is the public virtue par excellence, because it has to do with the good of the whole community. [This would correspond to the legal justice of Aristotle and St. Thomas. Is this how it is defined by St. Ambrose?] And yet it is not enough. Ambrose sets another quality alongside it: love of freedom, which he considers a criterion for discerning between good and bad rulers, since, as we read in another of this letters: “the good love freedom, the wicked love servitude” (Epistula 40, 2). [The classical or Roman conception of liberty?] Freedom is not a privilege for some, but a right for all, a precious right that civil authority must guarantee. Nevertheless, freedom does not mean the arbitrary choice of the individual, but implies rather responsibility of everyone. Here we find one of the principal elements of the secularity of the state: assure freedom so that everyone can propose their vision of common life, always, however, with respect for the other and in the context of laws that aim at the good of all. [This is rather bizarre - how many different visions of the common life can there be? There is only the good of community, living together. What may be disputed are the means (or the laws) by which this is to be preserved or enhanced. Or is the Holy Father thinking of the modern nation-state, which is arguably not a community? It would seem so --]
On the other hand, the extent to which the conception of a confessional state is left behind, it appears clear that, in any case, the laws must find their justification and force in natural law, which is order adequate to the dignity of the human person, overcoming a merely positivist conception from which it is not possible to derive precepts that are, in some way, of an ethical character (cf. Speech to the German Parliament, Sept. 22, 2011). The state is at the service of and protects the person and his “well-being” in its multiple aspects, beginning with the right to life, the deliberate suppression of which is never permissible. Everyone can see then how legislation and the work of state institutions must be especially in the service of the family, founded on marriage and open to life, and how there must be a recognition of the primary right of the parents to freely educate and form their children, according to the educational plan that they judge valid and pertinent. The family is not treated justly if the state does not support the freedom of education for the common good of society as a whole. [So is the modern conception of the "state" problematic? How does it expand upon the notions of government and authority? We can say government should serve the common good, the community and its members. Personalist formulations of political science are not irreconcilable with earlier formulations. One must examine what a personalist says about the good of community and whether it is higher than the private good of the individual. While the "modern" notion of the state may have been formulated by certain writers during the 16th and 17th centuries, their definition(s) may not apply to every instance of the word. It depends on the author's intention, which should be made clear in the text or in his corpus of writings at least.]
Zenit: Address by Metropolitan Gennadios to the 3rd Catholic-Orthodox Forum
"The Unity That We All Seek is a Gift From Above"
"The Unity That We All Seek is a Gift From Above"
Zenit: Cardinal Ouellet at International Theology Symposium
The Ecclesiology of Communion, 50 Years after the Opening of Vatican Council II
The Ecclesiology of Communion, 50 Years after the Opening of Vatican Council II
3. Eucharistic ecclesiology
It is important to stress here that the ecclesiology of communion promoted by the Council takes its inspiration from the Eucharistic ecclesiology of the Orthodox, especially Afanassief, who is cited in the texts. The Council’s ecclesiology is thus of great ecumenical import. The intervention of John Zizioulas, the Metropolitan of Pergamon, at the 2005 Roman Synod of Bishops on the Eucharist, testifies to this: “The ecclesiology of communion promoted by Vatican II and deepened further by eminent Roman Catholic theologians can make sense only if it derives from the eucharistic life of the Church. The Eucharist belongs not simply to the beneesse but to theesseof the Church. The whole life, word and structure of the Church iseucharistic in its very essence.”[9] Walter Kasper agrees wholeheartedly and holds that “eucharistic ecclesiology has become one of the most important foundations of the ecumenical dialogue between the Catholic Church and the Orthodox Churches.”
Showing respect for a tradition
Lee Faber has two pertaining to the insertion of Scotus into a genealogical narrative and using of sources (or the lack of proper sources): MacIntyre on Scotus and Alexander Broadie's Gifford Lecture
One should attempt to understand the arguments of a medieval on their own terms instead of relying on secondary sources in intellectual history or even philosophy, making use of followers of that tradition and contemporary scholars. This should not be so hard to understand. Even though I can respect MacIntyre for the philosophical and rhetorical value of some of his arguments pertaining to moral philosophy, it is unfortunate that much of his work is tied to intellectual history. (Alas this is because of his theses concerning moral epistemology and tradition.)
Better to understand one tradition well and argue accordingly -- leave the understanding of history to the Beatific Vision.
One should attempt to understand the arguments of a medieval on their own terms instead of relying on secondary sources in intellectual history or even philosophy, making use of followers of that tradition and contemporary scholars. This should not be so hard to understand. Even though I can respect MacIntyre for the philosophical and rhetorical value of some of his arguments pertaining to moral philosophy, it is unfortunate that much of his work is tied to intellectual history. (Alas this is because of his theses concerning moral epistemology and tradition.)
Better to understand one tradition well and argue accordingly -- leave the understanding of history to the Beatific Vision.
Wednesday, June 06, 2012
New from Catholic Courses
Dr. John Cuddeback of Christendom College has written a book on friendship; now he has a set of lectures on the same topic for Catholic Courses. (A preview of the book.)
An article in The Review of Metaphysics.
Human Nature and the Virtuous Life
An article in The Review of Metaphysics.
Human Nature and the Virtuous Life
Labels:
Christendom College,
ethics,
friendship,
moral philosophy
Tuesday, June 05, 2012
Monday, June 04, 2012
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)