"political order it describes might be attained. The first of these assumptions is entirely false; the second entirely misses the point of the book."https://t.co/pBeZ7ld3GK
— Fr Thomas Crean OP (@crean_fr) July 9, 2020
Reality Journal
"political order it describes might be attained. The first of these assumptions is entirely false; the second entirely misses the point of the book."https://t.co/pBeZ7ld3GK
— Fr Thomas Crean OP (@crean_fr) July 9, 2020
A new translation from The Josias, with an introductory note addressing some recent confusions. https://t.co/KCPmnNBVuV
— Pater Edmund (@sancrucensis) July 8, 2020
Glad to say I've recieved a first print of my new book 'Catholic Cosmopolitanism and Human Rights'. Indebted to @samuelmoyn for his foreword and guidance, & to @hmtennapel & @smullallylaw for their endorsements. Available 5th March. @CUP_Law @IrishCentreHRhttps://t.co/9yor8YOgbn pic.twitter.com/glvjOoA445
— Leonard 'Emperor of Teaching' Taylor (@leonsaviour) February 24, 2020
Join us Wed., July 8, 3:30–4:45pm EDT for this seminar focused on "Co-Responsibility for Care of the Vulnerable." @jessfkeating is hosting; @JohnCavadini, @CCamosy, & Margie Pfeil are speaking.
— Leonard J. DeLorenzo, Ph.D. (@leodelo2) July 8, 2020
This seminar is FREE but registration is required: https://t.co/mk96Xb56gg https://t.co/PTCZfunO7X
A new episode of Sed Contra is now available. Join Drs. William Diem, @MDugandzic, @thomaesplendor, and @FrDylanSchrader as they discuss whether the will always chooses the good that it perceives to be higher. https://t.co/xS3epiY2XN
— The Sacra Doctrina Project (@sacradoctrina) July 7, 2020
Zoroastrianism is ancient. People still practice it. This is a story of returning to its origins. https://t.co/tQSpJFaFxe
— s.e. smith (@sesmith) July 3, 2020
My review/symposium contribution for Don Herzog's new book, "Sovereignty RIP." https://t.co/74uPMaD43W
— Jack Goldsmith (@jacklgoldsmith) July 6, 2020
"Global Byzantium at Ankara" series of Zoom-talks coming up on Friday 10, 17, and 24 July at 7pm Istanbul / 12pm EST, with lots of great speakers on timely topics! See link --> https://t.co/2x0NmGG96m pic.twitter.com/VSPAJ5RDYR
— Jordan Pickett (@jordantpickett) July 6, 2020
For centuries, going back into the mists of time, the priest has said the words “Mysterium fidei” in the midst of the words of consecration whispered over the chalice. These words powerfully evoke the irruption or inbreaking of God into our midst in this unfathomable Sacrament. The consecration of the wine completes the signification of the sacrifice of the Cross, the moment when our High Priest obtained for us eternal redemption (cf. Heb 9:12), the re-presentation of which, together with the application of its fruits, is the very purpose of the Mass.and
Even if the words mysterium fidei are not necessary for signifying transubstantiation (and thus, the consecration can be “effective,” and the Mass “valid,” without them), the removal of the phrase from its age-old position exudes the attitude: nothing is sacred.Does this use of "mysterium fidei" match what St. Paul means by the Mystery, Christ becoming Incarnate so that we may be incorporated in Him? If that is what St. Paul meant, then why would "mysterium fidei" be used before anyone had actually received Holy Communion?
HAGIA SOPHIA: SOME PERSONAL REFLECTIONS by Phil Dorroll https://t.co/ZE8CU3FNsh via @OrthoDialogue
— Orthodoxy in Dialogue (@OrthoDialogue) July 6, 2020
EL EXTRAÑO CASO DE LA RENUNCIA DE BENEDICTO. UNA NUEVA EXPLICACIÓN. https://t.co/29WIGXpkrC
— Marco Tosatti (@MarcoTosatti) July 6, 2020