Robert Moynihan Interviews Archbishop Viganò

The Viganò Tapes. Robert Moynihan Interviews the Archbishop. https://t.co/8zK7svQhEc

— Marco Tosatti (@MarcoTosatti) September 14, 2021

A New Video from Archbishop Viganò

Viganò: Libera Nos a Malo. Considerations on the Great Reset https://t.co/TuHLHIgVpK

— Marco Tosatti (@MarcoTosatti) August 31, 2021

Defending the Faith Against Present Heresies

New Book about Pope Francis' Pontificate (Arouca Press) - https://mailchi.mp/0eafaddb64dc/defending-the-faith

Posted by Arouca Press on Wednesday, March 3, 2021

Rorate Caeli: Announcing the Publication of Defending the Faith Against Present Heresies

Another Viganò Interview

VIGANÒ INTERVIEW: Among other fascinating insights, the Archbishop also shares what he truly thinks of Pope Benedict XVI and the controversies surrounding him. https://t.co/Wx5uNIwWlr

— Michael J. Matt (@Michael_J_Matt) March 14, 2021

The Latest from Archbishop Viganò

Viganò. The Oath against Modernism, its Abolition, Ratzinger’s Faults. https://t.co/DZLWdn8j0W

— Marco Tosatti (@MarcoTosatti) January 11, 2021

More from Archbishop Viganò on the Great Reset

I send the archbishop’s text to you as Advent Season begins as a possible starting point for a more general reflection on human freedom and religious freedom in these unusual times.https://t.co/sPqe7uT2TH#FindingVigano #MoynihanLetters #GreatReset

— Robert Moynihan (@RobertMoynihan) December 2, 2020

Archbishop Viganò Responds to the McCarrick Report

Mgr. Viganò Replies to the McCarrick Report of the Secretariat of State. https://t.co/9EFFvRsDMI

— Marco Tosatti (@MarcoTosatti) November 24, 2020

Would the archbishop respond to the following? Maybe...

NEW, Michael Warren Davis on the ongoing scandal in the Catholic Church: The former nuncio became a trad hero after accusing Pope Francis of inaction on McCarrick. But there may be a beam in the accuser's eye. https://t.co/E5ovCXxMnt

— The American Conservative (@amconmag) November 23, 2020

The Arroyo-Viganò Transcript

And this is the only COMPLETE TRANSCRIPT of the World Over Interview with Archbishop Vigano. I have seen other alternative transcripts floating around. They are incomplete, omit questions, and add material not a part of our interview. @NCRegister @EWTN https://t.co/rseeIhKLSm

— Raymond Arroyo (@RaymondArroyo) November 13, 2020

NCReg

Raymond Arroyo Interviews Archbishop Viganò

The Remnant

The Remnant Newspaper - ARCHBISHOP CARLO MARIA VIGANÒ Interviewed by Raymond Arroyo https://t.co/RlSejHibNU

— The Remnant (@remnantnews) November 13, 2020

full episode

And...

VIGANÒ: WHY DIDN’T THE VATICAN CALL ME TO TESTIFY? https://t.co/ehr00wJtEc

— Marco Tosatti (@MarcoTosatti) November 13, 2020

The Peña Parra Case

A reminder that Becciu’s successor as sostituto was a curious choice of new broom… The Peña Parra case: An excellent test of Archbishop Vigano’s credibility | Catholic Culture https://t.co/kayz2SSBee

— Damian Thompson (@holysmoke) November 7, 2020

1P5 Has a Copy of Archbishop Viganò's Talk for the Catholic Identity Conference

Scapegoating Francis: How the Revolution of Vatican II Serves the New World Order

Archbishop Viganò's Address for the (Roman) Catholic Identity Conference

This text reads like an encyclical, here Novus Ordo: "The coup de grâce of this attitude was codified in the Reformed Liturgy, which manifests its embarrassment of Catholic dogma by silencing it – and thus denying it indirectly. The ritual change engendered a doctrinal change..."

— Maike Hickson (@HicksonMaike) October 23, 2020

LSN

Archbishop Viganò on Fratelli Tutti

LSN: Abp. Viganò on Pope’s new Fratelli Tutti document: Brotherhood against God is ‘blasphemous’ Archbishop Viganò criticizes 'equivocal' statements of Fratelli Tutti that 'are lacking clarity,' and he once more rejects the novel concept of religious liberty introduced by the Second Vatican Council and which Pope Francis once more now endorses.

Network Tribalism at Work?

Seems like at this point the only ones paying attention would be Latin traditionalists.

Archbishop Viganò: Without Vatican II, Destruction Wrought by Revolutions of the 1960s Would Not Have Happened https://t.co/wnU0nTBm0O pic.twitter.com/7loyawXLu8

— Edward Pentin (@EdwardPentin) September 14, 2020

“In days gone by, forbidden books were censored in order to protect the simple ones, whose souls would be poisoned by them; today, what is good is censored, because evil does not tolerate it.” — +Viganò, Sept. 12 interview with @MarcoTosatti https://t.co/wnU0nTBm0O pic.twitter.com/2P8CHwqLH4

— Edward Pentin (@EdwardPentin) September 14, 2020

Douglas Farrow on Bishop Schneider's and Archbishop Viganò's Objections Regarding Vatican II

Dethroning Christ? The error at the root of the Viganò controversy (Part I)

Part 2

Farrow seems to admit this much:

Now, surely there is nothing wrong with a document promulgated in a political context being on its way to a political rather than an evangelical end, so long as that end is understood to be proximate rather than ultimate. There’s the rub, however. For the Abu Dhabi Declaration seems to be evangelically deficient in a way no political aim can justify. Its call to “come together in the vast space of spiritual, human and shared social values,” and to do so in such as way as to avoid “unproductive discussions,” might reasonably be taken to rule out the very thing Paul was doing on Mars Hill!

But Farrow cannot get beyond the parameters set by Latin ecclesiology, taken by Latins to be dogma:

When we keep this in mind, we can see more easily that to give the answer we ought to give, the answer we must give if we do not intend to be schismatic – the answer that Vatican II was indeed an authentic ecumenical council, engaged in the work of God and of the magisterium of the Church under God – is not to commit ourselves to the untenable notion that its fathers were uniformly faithful or that its documents, despite the flaws of their authors, were themselves essentially flawless.

As a Latin he must accept the claim by Rome that Vatican II is an ecumenical council. Because he must accept that, he must uphold the hermeneutic of continuity, much as Benedict XVI. Part 2 is better in so far as he responds to certain misconceptions (held by some Latin integralists and Latin traditionalists) regarding nature of the Kingship of Christ.

More from Archbishop Viganò on Vatican II

VIGANÒ: THERE IS A SUPERDOGMA OF THE VATICAN II. UNTOUCHABLE. https://t.co/uXUnaNrD9L

— Marco Tosatti (@MarcoTosatti) September 4, 2020

The Intramural Debate Continues

I asked Archbishop Viganò for a comment on #BishopBarron's recent anti-Traditionalist defense of Vatican II. His response is devastating, especially for those who agree with Bp. Barron. https://t.co/hIU4IMesif

— Michael J. Matt (@Michael_J_Matt) August 16, 2020

Remnant

A Crisis Point for Latin Ecclesiology Yet?

The fundamental problem with the Catholic Church goes much deeper than Francis. Archbishop Viganò and Fr. Thomas Weinandy debate the mother of all conspiracies... the plot to silence the Catholic Church from within. https://t.co/cZCQm4awDD

— Michael J. Matt (@Michael_J_Matt) August 11, 2020

We know the Vatican - probably issuing from Sect' of State - has ordered certain high - profile persons to crank up the pressure on V-II. Tornielli - in charge of https://t.co/rRo0wBadiH, has issued orders in all language sections to assign someone the task.

They're panicking. https://t.co/hzuM87SsNF

— Hilary White (@hilarityjane) August 12, 2020

Fr. Weinandy Replies to Vatican II Critics

Father Thomas Weinandy writing a thoughtful reflection on recent attempts to criticize and blame Vatican II....

https://t.co/q4Pva2k6z8

— Fr. Thomas Petri, OP (@PetriOP) July 27, 2020

ITV

Another Interview with Archbishop Viganò

VIGANÒ, EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW. THE POPE AND THE SODOMITES https://t.co/2udM67vv0F

— Marco Tosatti (@MarcoTosatti) July 25, 2020