A Response to Latin Trads

But still making use of a Latin notion of sacrifice.

CLJ

Confessions of a Post-'Rad Trad' Millennial: The Perfect Sacrifice https://t.co/pfcoUypne4 #wednesdaymorning #CatholicTwitter #WednesdayWisdom #Catholic #religion #theology

— Church Life Journal (@ChurchLifeND) July 1, 2020

Shaun Blanchard on the History Behind Vatican I

CLJ

The Twists and Turns That Led to the First Vatican Council https://t.co/yQQI6ntZ4K #wednesdaymorning #CatholicTwitter #WednesdayWisdom #Catholic #religion #theology

— Church Life Journal (@ChurchLifeND) July 1, 2020

Shaun Blanchard is one of the most interesting young Catholic theologians in North America. I am proud to call him my student. Here a new piece of his: #Catholic #CatholicTwitter https://t.co/TEDnApD3cw

— Ulrich L. Lehner (@ulrichlehner) July 1, 2020

This is more a history essay than a theological one; I presume the author is a Latin and so is unable to critically evaluate Rome's claims regarding the authority of the pope. Certainly the claims of hours
Isdiction have been recognized as being serious by the Eastern Orthodox for quite some time, and rejected as not being of Apostolic Tradition.

JD Flynn on the Latin Problem Who Is Archbishop Viganò

CNA

Enough already.https://t.co/p0pWS2A4rm

— Taylor Patrick O'Neill (@thomaesplendor) July 1, 2020

To be sure, few theologians or bishops would argue that Vatican II’s documents are above reproach, in terms of their style, their language, or their presentation of the faith. And scholars continue to disagree about how to interpret some key texts of the council. But accepting the legitimacy and authority of the Second Vatican Council is a necessary component of maintaining communion with the Church herself.

Latins can go on believing Vatican II was an ecumenical council; they need a Divine Rebuke.