📢@PappasPatristic is pleased to announce six additional speakers to the Colloquium on the Mystagogy of St. Maximos the Confessor (April 28-30, 2022) https://t.co/AgkeDJYXAI: Jelena Bogdanović, Thomas Cattoi, Demetrios Harper, Robin Jensen, Tamsin Jones, and Vitaly Permiakov.
— The Pappas Patristic Institute (@PappasPatristic) October 19, 2021
Tuesday, October 19, 2021
Colloquium on the Mystagogy of St. Maximos the Confessor
The Ethical Discourses
The treatises on the mystical life, usually rendered as The Ethical Discourses, comprise St Symeon's most extensive treatment of the experience of God. Volume I selects those treatises devoted to the Church, the sacraments and the last things. Buy now: https://t.co/BWkFHLknWd pic.twitter.com/m8wvLeuUye
— SVS Press (@SVSPress) October 18, 2021
This is the second of a three-volume series translating The Ethical Discourses into English for the first time. In this collection he addresses the traditional language of Eastern Christian asceticism in the light of his message. Buy now: https://t.co/Z3bh7csVYL pic.twitter.com/qXwn6vZ1mH
— SVS Press (@SVSPress) October 19, 2021
Friday, April 16, 2021
Orthodox Theology in the 20th Century and Early 21st Century
The Orthodox Theology expounds the doctrine of the Church for each generation of the faithful, and for each particular pastoral context, in order to proclaim God's love for the entire world, as it is expressed in the Gospels.
— Basilica.ro (EN) (@BasilicaNews) April 16, 2021
More in the book. :)👉 https://t.co/X07EwbH1cT. pic.twitter.com/Ob1dEyxYD1
Thursday, March 25, 2021
Byzantine Soteriology
And thus all who are in Him may become one with God, being healed of their sin and corruption, freed from demonic domination and granted eternal life in the resurrection. 6/
— Fr. Andrew Stephen Damick (@FrAndrewSDamick) March 25, 2021
Friday, September 18, 2020
Bridal Mysticism in the Byzantine Rite?
I love the prayer experience of talking to Jesus by quoting one of his beloved saints. pic.twitter.com/x5U4UkmxUf
— Fr. Michael O'Loughlin (@PadreMichaelO) September 16, 2020
Sunday, September 06, 2020
Wednesday, September 02, 2020
For Those Interested in Palamas
Apparently a research project devoted to studying the two variants of Gregory Palamas' (in)famous third letter to Gregory Akindynos on the essence/energies distinction has just published (all?/some of?) its results on a new site, yesterday: https://t.co/w2Y5YVMUYN
— Jonathan Greig (@jabgreig) September 2, 2020
website
Tuesday, September 01, 2020
Eastern Christian Books: To Attain the Full Stature of the Perfect Christ
Sunday, August 23, 2020
Wednesday, August 19, 2020
The Byzantine View of the Incarnation
"We need to stop seeing the Incarnation as a reaction of God to the Fall, but see the Incarnation as the very purpose of Creation."
— Jonathan Pageau (@PageauJonathan) August 19, 2020
From the Clips channel. https://t.co/62n918Tdib
Tuesday, August 18, 2020
Wednesday, July 22, 2020
Friday, May 29, 2020
Patrick Viscuso Reviews Kevin Schembri's Oikonomia
The reviewer is a priest and canonist for GOARCH:
The Reverend Dr. Patrick Viscuso is a priest of the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese and a canonist specializing in marriage and gender issues. His doctorate in historical theology from The Catholic University of American concentrated on Byzantine and Oriental canon law, patristic studies, and church history. He also holds a Master of Divinity from Holy Cross Greek Orthodox School of Theology and a Bachelor of Science in Foreign Service from Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service, Georgetown University. Fr. Viscuso is the author of a large number of scholarly publications in the field of Late Byzantine Canon Law and is a specialist in marriage legislation and theology. His most recent writings focus on the relationship of marriage to ordination, purity issues, divorce, and women's superstitions in late Byzantium.
Perhaps he has written something on the Byzantine canons on marriage and divorce.
In his review of Oikonomia: Divorce and Remarriage in the Eastern Orthodox Tradition, he notes
Another point repeatedly made is that the "Orthodox tradition" invests the indissolubility of marriage with an eternal character and consequently views remarriage as a concession or expression of ecclesial oikonomia. The absence of the Eucharist and crowning during late Byzantine celebration of second and third marriages is said to imply that Orthodoxy regarded or still regards these unions as less than sacramental in some way.
However, the author fails to show any articulation of marriage as an eternal bond in Orthodox canonical or theological literature prior to the twentieth century, when this theological opinion came to be expressed at the Institut de Théologie Orthodoxe Saint-Serge. In fact, there are substantial Byzantine texts that articulate a contrary view affirming that marriage is ended by death, an example being the Scriptural commentaries of Theophylaktos, archbishop of Ohrid (b. ca. 1055-d. after 1126), specifically on Luke 20:34–36.
The assertions regarding the non-sacramental nature of second and third unions within Orthodoxy do not adequately address the facts. For instance, there was no uniform practice regarding crowning of a second or third marriage in Byzantium. Second unions were definitely crowned according to the usage of the Great Church; the presence or absence of crowning did not mean that a sacerdotal blessing of the marriage did not take place; and, since the Eucharist was not a constitutive element in the establishment of the marriage, the canonical restriction of the second and third married from the Eucharist during a period of penance did not mean that the union, as established by sacerdotal blessing, was not regarded as sacramental and incapable of sanctification.
Furthermore, in considering such questions, the absence of the Eucharist from the marriage service is completely irrelevant to its sacramental nature. As is obvious to those who have ever attended a contemporary ceremony, Orthodox marriages today are considered blessed and sacramental without the reception of the Eucharist during their celebration, even the so-called mixed marriages of Roman Catholics and Orthodox. Also, the author's emphasis on the penitential nature of second and third unions does not adequately address contemporary practice, where such penances are no longer imposed.
A dominant theologoumenon is not the same as dogma... and the opinion that marriage is eternal may not even be dominant in the various Byzantine ecclesial traditions.
So second and third "marriages" may be deemed "sacramental"? And yet a period of penance might be required. Is there a authoritative work discussing penances in the canons and their rationale?
I will have to eventually get a Byzantine textbook on marriage but probably at least one that covers a range of opinions among the various ecclesial traditions, or several textbooks. I don't think I would rely on a Greek one alone.