Showing posts with label canon law. Show all posts
Showing posts with label canon law. Show all posts

Tuesday, August 08, 2023

Bergoglio as Legislator



Friday, July 22, 2022

"Supreme Legislator"

Wednesday, June 15, 2022

Franciscan "Collegiality"

Tuesday, November 30, 2021

Cormac Burke Passes

Wednesday, September 01, 2021

What Progress with the Annulment Situation?

Thursday, August 05, 2021

Next on the Agenda: False Ecumenism?

Thursday, July 29, 2021

The Bergoglian Revision of Penal Law

Sunday, July 25, 2021

Two Divergent Positions




Friday, July 23, 2021

Cardinal Burke's Response to Traditionis Custodes

Saturday, July 03, 2021

Spot the Flaw



The purported link between charity (a supernatural infused virtue) and civil law. That the observance and execution of law should be motivated by charity is unquestionable; whether this can be legislated by a human authority is the dubious part, and this applies to ecclesial law as well. What matters for human law is the justice of the external action that is commanded (or prohibited).

Thursday, June 17, 2021

A Return to Mysticism?



Various spiritual writers and theologians have been praised as being precursors of Vatican II in calling for the return of the Christian faithful to the pursuit of holiness. But was a synod the appropriate means for trying to implement such a reform? A centralized system cannot help but look for a centralized solution; was a better way possible? Are there too many human obstacles to the action of the Holy Spirit, especially in the form of ecclesial power structures?

Friday, June 11, 2021

Rome Exercising "Universal and Ordinary Jurisdiction"

There is an argument that since these ecclesial movements are international that only the bishop of Rome has the competent authority to deal with them. But perhaps there shouldn't be international ecclesial movements that are not subject to the oversight of the local ordinary -- after all, isn't that the current situation now? And if the head of a movement is found to be abusive? Then it is up to the other members of that movement to bring him to a canonical trial, with local bishops involved. Instead we have legislation from Rome to deal with a problem that should be handled at the local level first. There is nothing to Latin teaching on the papacy that guarantees that decisions made by the Roman Curia will be correct or that "Canon Law" will be legislated properly or justly. And the fact that abuses of authority by Rome do happen is an argument against Roman claims of primacy.

Monday, June 07, 2021

Sanctions by Whom?

Who wields "authority" to sanction these offenders, presbyteral or episcopal?

Tuesday, June 01, 2021

Ed Peters on the Revisions to Canon Law

Changes to Roman Canon Law

Necessary? Or do they reinforce an untenable thesis concerning ecclesial authority, especially the authority of the bishop of Rome in relation to other bishops? Why should such rules be created by one man alone, rather than through a synod? Because of Latin ecclesiology.














Saturday, May 29, 2021

Some Leeway?



This is Latin centralization? Should a particular Church with a special cult to a person be able to recognize that person in its public liturgy? Roman canon law allows for that this but says it mst be done through an official "legislative" act and not extemporaneously. Even if spontaneity were to be "permitted," should it be up to the discretion of whoever is planning the liturgy, rather the bishop in consultation with the people?

Friday, May 28, 2021

Latin Progs Continue to Spin Cardinal Ladaria's Letter




Thursday, May 27, 2021

Revisions to Roman Canon Law



Wednesday, May 26, 2021

Canonists on Vos Estis



Will any of them dissent and say that it was bad legislation?

Tuesday, May 25, 2021

Mark Brumley on Pro-Abortion Catholic Politicans