Really solid thread. The “Vatican Catholic” sedevacantists lied in their video on Florence-Ferrara that the union was agreed on by every Patriarchate except that represented by St. Mark of Ephesus. They don’t even know the basics of the topic. https://t.co/nipdE5CdEi
— Brother Augustine (@BrotherAugusti2) August 23, 2022
Showing posts with label Council of Florence. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Council of Florence. Show all posts
Monday, August 22, 2022
Now Do... Chalcedon
Monday, July 20, 2020
A Sample Article from Logos
New sample article (PDF)
— Sheptytsky Institute (@Sheptytsky) July 20, 2020
How Did the Union of Florence Influence the Union of Brest?
Alexander Baranhttps://t.co/b6JLO5ri4A@GregorySMcMuray @EternalSean @byzantinepower @MarkNanneman @BillTooke @AllanRuhl @AUniate @toplis_percy @AveCristoRey @Wandi_Star pic.twitter.com/qeghdlWYef
Friday, July 17, 2020
What if...
Constance and Florence aren't ecumenical either?
Sandro Magister: The “Fake News” of Viganò and Company. Unmasked by a Cardinal
Roberto De Mattei responds.
And today:
Rorate Caeli: 150th Anniversary of the Dogmatic Constitution PASTOR ÆTERNUS (Vatican I): Petrine Primacy, Infallibility, and the Strict Limits of Papal Authority
Sandro Magister: The “Fake News” of Viganò and Company. Unmasked by a Cardinal
Roberto De Mattei responds.
And today:
Rorate Caeli: 150th Anniversary of the Dogmatic Constitution PASTOR ÆTERNUS (Vatican I): Petrine Primacy, Infallibility, and the Strict Limits of Papal Authority
Wednesday, December 11, 2019
Not Getting It
Latin traditionalists still failing to grasp that the problem is not Vatican I or Vatican II or even the Council of Florence; it is Latin ecclesiology concerning the primacy of the bishop of Rome, as Latin pretensions concerning the primacy of the bishop of Rome arguably go back to the first millenium. Did any other Apostolic Church accept them? Would it have even made sense for them to, in an age of limited communication and an already multiethnic and multicultural Church? Perhaps the claim could have been sustained when the whole Church still understood and spoke Greek, including the bishop of Rome, but once that linguistic unity passed? How could the bishop of Rome possibly be competent to teach Christianity in any other language except his own? No man can be fluent in every single human language, and there is no special divine gift or charism that makes the bishop of Rome such a panglot.
What sort of rationalist apologetics for such an exaggerated notion of primacy can Latins pull out of their hats now?
1P5: The Second Vatican Council Is Now Far Spent by Peter Kwasniewski
What sort of rationalist apologetics for such an exaggerated notion of primacy can Latins pull out of their hats now?
1P5: The Second Vatican Council Is Now Far Spent by Peter Kwasniewski
Thursday, November 28, 2019
Friday, November 08, 2019
Tuesday, June 25, 2019
The Theotokos Is a Florentine Latin Traditionalist?
Who would have known?
Crisis Magazine: Our Lady of Good Success Speaks To Us Today by Jonathan B. Coe
Now do the original writings say this, or have there been some edits/interpolations made by the editor (who is associated with TFP)? Or is this merely a statement of fact, without implying approval of such? (And one can maintain that the appropriation of the papal states was an unjust act without sanctioning the acquisition or maintenance of dominion over those states in the first place.)
Crisis Magazine: Our Lady of Good Success Speaks To Us Today by Jonathan B. Coe
On December 8, 1634, the archangels, Gabriel, Michael, and Raphael appeared to Mariana with the Queen of Heaven, and Gabriel was carrying a Ciborium filled with hosts. Our Lady then predicted events over two hundred years into the future for the reign of Pius IX:
His pontifical infallibility will be declared a dogma of the Faith by the same Pope chosen to proclaim the dogma of the Mystery of My Immaculate Conception. He will be imprisoned in the Vatican by the unjust usurpation of the Pontifical States through the iniquity, envy and avarice of an earthly monarchy.
Now do the original writings say this, or have there been some edits/interpolations made by the editor (who is associated with TFP)? Or is this merely a statement of fact, without implying approval of such? (And one can maintain that the appropriation of the papal states was an unjust act without sanctioning the acquisition or maintenance of dominion over those states in the first place.)
Tuesday, April 23, 2019
A. Edward Siecienski's Dissertation
The use of Maximus the Confessor's writing on the filioque at the Council of Ferrara -Florence (1438--1439) by A. Edward Siecienski, Fordham University
Thursday, November 22, 2018
Theology of Baptism
and theology of the authority of the Church...
Parts 1, 2, and 3 of Vatican II and Crisis in the Theology of Baptism" by Thomas Pink (via Peter Kwasniewski)
Re: the importance or necessity of exorcism -- is the accompanying theology of "sovereignty" of the devil over the unbaptized an established part of the Faith, or is it just a theological opinion? And how should it be understood?
Parts 1, 2, and 3 of Vatican II and Crisis in the Theology of Baptism" by Thomas Pink (via Peter Kwasniewski)
Re: the importance or necessity of exorcism -- is the accompanying theology of "sovereignty" of the devil over the unbaptized an established part of the Faith, or is it just a theological opinion? And how should it be understood?
Sunday, November 11, 2018
What sort of Latin view?
CWR: The Conversion of the Papacy and the Present Church Crisis by Dr. Douglas Farrow
The reform we need is in the direction of simplicity, transparency, and integrity – what many thought we were getting in Francis, before discovering otherwise – and whatever does not serve directly the task of the successor of Peter should be marginalized or eliminated.
The author lists seven features of the current crisis, including:
The author also responds to Roberto de Mattei. Farrow's view of the papacy appears to be more balanced than De Mattei's (or that of many ultramontanists and Tridentine Roman Catholics) but he nevertheless accepts the definitions of the Council of Florence as dogma, and the status of the Council of Florence as an ecumenical council.
The reform we need is in the direction of simplicity, transparency, and integrity – what many thought we were getting in Francis, before discovering otherwise – and whatever does not serve directly the task of the successor of Peter should be marginalized or eliminated.
The author lists seven features of the current crisis, including:
seventh, a deliberate plan to use the papacy to dissolve what is left of the centralized, authoritarian Tridentine Church and to overcome the synthesis of Vatican I and II that was attempted, with limited success, by the previous four popes – that is, to generate a decentralized, morally and doctrinally flexible, post-modern Church that is open both to Protestant and to pagan elements, with a vast and welcoming Courtyard of the Gentiles.
The author also responds to Roberto de Mattei. Farrow's view of the papacy appears to be more balanced than De Mattei's (or that of many ultramontanists and Tridentine Roman Catholics) but he nevertheless accepts the definitions of the Council of Florence as dogma, and the status of the Council of Florence as an ecumenical council.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)