November 1-3
Sunday, October 06, 2013
Saturday, October 05, 2013
Vatican II: Recalling Our Past, Looking To Our Future
Commemorating the 50th Anniversary of the Second Vatican Council
BC prof.
Commemorating the 50th Anniversary of the Second Vatican Council
Public Lectures Series
The academic year 2013-2014 brings with it a fresh lecture series to celebrate Vatican II. John Baldovin, S.J., will speak on Vatican II and the Renewal of Liturgy on October 16, 2013. For more information on this upcoming lecture, view the event's page.
BC prof.
Labels:
Boston College,
Jesuits,
liturgical reform,
local events,
Roman rite,
Vatican II
Friday, October 04, 2013
Eagle Eye Ministries - Life on the Rock
Fr. Mark and Doug welcome Fr. Nathan Cromly of Eagle Eye Ministries, to discuss their focus on Christian charity as a giving of oneself and living it out through "prayer, study, fraternal charity and apostolic serive."
Song for Wisdom
Thursday, October 03, 2013
Wednesday, October 02, 2013
Monday, September 30, 2013
Sunday, September 29, 2013
Saturday, September 28, 2013
The Imaginative Conservative: Male and Female Souls by Stratford Caldecott
"If the soul is the “form” of the body, one might assume that masculinity and femininity are characteristics of the soul before they are of the body."
Characteristics of the soul? I don't like the wording here, though I agree with the point he is making - being "female" or "male" is not outside of the soul.
"It seems to me that not enough attention was given to the fact that in Genesis 3:16 man’s ruling over woman is identified as a consequence of the Fall, rather than as part of the original order of things."
Ruling over women? Or lording it over women like the gentiles?
Why use "gender" instead of "sex"?
Would we say that Dr. Caldecott is trapped in the categories of late 20th ce thought?
"If the soul is the “form” of the body, one might assume that masculinity and femininity are characteristics of the soul before they are of the body."
Characteristics of the soul? I don't like the wording here, though I agree with the point he is making - being "female" or "male" is not outside of the soul.
"It seems to me that not enough attention was given to the fact that in Genesis 3:16 man’s ruling over woman is identified as a consequence of the Fall, rather than as part of the original order of things."
Ruling over women? Or lording it over women like the gentiles?
Why use "gender" instead of "sex"?
Would we say that Dr. Caldecott is trapped in the categories of late 20th ce thought?
Friday, September 27, 2013
Rorate Caeli: Traditionalism and academic censorship - a personal experience and a very grave episode by Dr. John Lamont
Forget that it is an academic journal; the editors might argue that it is a Catholic theological journal and must be held to different standards, in which case is there a danger of causing scandal or harm to the reputation of the journal if they were to publish an article by someone who is publicly associated with the SSPX?
Forget that it is an academic journal; the editors might argue that it is a Catholic theological journal and must be held to different standards, in which case is there a danger of causing scandal or harm to the reputation of the journal if they were to publish an article by someone who is publicly associated with the SSPX?
Thursday, September 26, 2013
Tuesday, September 24, 2013
CSMonitor: Why it matters that Jews are standing on the Temple Mount by Christa Case Bryant
Jews are increasingly staking a claim to the Muslim-controlled Temple Mount, testing the Israeli government's resolve to avoid conflict by protecting Muslim sovereignty over the site.
Jews are increasingly staking a claim to the Muslim-controlled Temple Mount, testing the Israeli government's resolve to avoid conflict by protecting Muslim sovereignty over the site.
The Fifth Marian Dogma: The Church’s Unused Weapon by Dr. Mark Miravalle and Richard L. Russell
Properly understood, it would not cause difficulties for Protestants (probably) or Orthodox, but is it an opportune moment to exercise papal infallibility through a dogmatic definition again? And would it really do much to solve the practical problems within the Roman Catholic churches?
Properly understood, it would not cause difficulties for Protestants (probably) or Orthodox, but is it an opportune moment to exercise papal infallibility through a dogmatic definition again? And would it really do much to solve the practical problems within the Roman Catholic churches?
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)