Showing posts with label Church and State Relations. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Church and State Relations. Show all posts

Saturday, October 02, 2021

Establishment Theologoumenon on the State's Role Regarding Education

Saturday, January 30, 2021

Tom Holland on the Influence of Christianity on Politics

Wednesday, January 20, 2021

A Question

Does any ecclesial tradition have prayers at the Eucharist for tyrants or those who hold political authority unjustly?

Wednesday, October 07, 2020

Cyril Hovorun. Public lecture on International Relations and Ecumenism



Thursday, July 09, 2020

Catholic Cosmopolitanism and Human Rights



Cambridge University Press

Wednesday, May 20, 2020

The Constantinian Legacy



See the thread.

Monday, May 11, 2020

What Is Needed for Reconciliation with Rome

According to Fr. Thomas Hopko -- AFR: What Does Rome Need To Do? - Part 2 (and Part 1)

Some are the same demands of Rome made by Orthodox polemicsts in the immediate centuries following the supposed date of the schism.

Russian Faith has a summary: 22 Changes Roman Catholics Must Make to Repent, Become Orthodox, and Join the One True Church

The restoration of ad orientem worship was not included, but it probably should have been. Many of Fr. Hopko's demands regarding supposed "doctrinal errors" seem to ignore legitimate differences in theologoumena between the Latin and the Byzantine churches. I will have to reconsider those.

The doctrinal errors concerning the papacy are important, and considered by others to be the main or primary obstacle to full reconciliation.

I agree with the demands that are based on the tradition once universally observed by the Church Universal:
Some comments on the following proposals:
Prepare Holy Communion with Leavened Bread
I have read that Rome used to use leavened bread as well; despite the claim that unleavened bread was used at the Last Supper, I don't see why Rome can't make the use of leavened bread at least optional.


Affirm New Bishops, Not Appoint Them
I think there need to be changes in how bishops are elected, but such a reform would require prior reforms of the local Church and its ecclesiology, and the Orthodox themselves need to consider what changes they should be making to church governance. So I don't think that should be a necessary condition for reconciliation.

Abdicate the Position as Head of State

With regards to the pope being a sort of figurehead and teacher of the universal teacher, I disagree with Hopko, who writes:
Then finally, in this area, I say: As leader of the world’s Christians, the pope of Rome would travel extensively. He would take full advantage of contemporary means of transportation and communication. He would master electronic media to serve his ministry in proclaiming Christ’s Gospel, propagating Christian faith, promoting ethical behavior, protecting human rights, and securing justice and peace for all people. He would be the servant of unity among all human beings, and first of all his fellow Christians, not as a unique episcopus episcoporum—that’s an expression of St. Cyprian—not as a bishop of other bishops—there is no bishop of other bishops, as was decreed already in the Council of Carthage in the third century: he is not the bishop of bishops; he is one of the equal bishops with all the others—so he would not have that position, but he would have the position as the leading bishop in the world, that Pope St. Gregory the Great called servus servorum Dei, the servant of the servants of God, among all the Christian bishops in the world. 

In an age of the collapse of a "civilization" powered by fossil fuels, this sort of role as "universal teacher" will pass into history. In the age of collapse, if anyone should be exercising some sort of teaching authority with regards to some political community or unit, it should be the local bishops, but within their competence, and the Christian laity must be acknowledged as having a role within the reform of political society that is partly separate from whatever teaching authority bishops may have in that area.

Sunday, May 10, 2020

The Nature-Grace Distinction

What relevance to the distinction between the distinction between "State" and "Church"?




Violence Necessary to Maintain Orthodoxy?



Making any act of heresy tantamount to treason is a papocaesarist's dream.

Tuesday, April 21, 2020

Integralism


Friday, November 16, 2018

What Are Legitimate Responses to Transgressions of the Limits of Authority?

Or if there is no legitimate authority to begin with? This essay does not address those questions.

Church Life: Why Is Christian Citizenship a Paradox? by Émilie Tardivel-Schick

Tuesday, October 31, 2017

A Sacred Kingdom



The Frankish churches exercising authority over the secular realm: standard from erroneous principles? Looking mistakenly at OT antecedents?

Wednesday, May 03, 2017

The Present Crisis in the Patriarchate of Rome

It is probably not correct to trace it as a consequence of ecclesial trends prior to and culminating in the Council of Trent, much less to intellectual trends alone, but one must also take into consideration the development of the modern nation-state (with its roots in the centralization of power by nationalist kings) and how the Church responded accordingly.

It's not just neo-scholasticism or Tridentine Roman Catholicism that is the problem, though they do have a major effect on the Church's ability to evangelize.

Friday, October 21, 2016

One Would Expect More from the Orthodox as Well

Seems that many Orthodox prelates can't help but embed themselves with American politicians, much like their Catholic counterparts. But at least the Russian-American Orthodox do not do this?

Byz, TX: NY Gov. Andrew Cuomo receives Pat. Athenagoras award

Saturday, August 08, 2015

Answerable to the People?

AmConMag: Byzantine Empire—or Republic?
The Byzantine Republic: People and Power in New Rome, Anthony Kaldellis, Harvard University Press, 312 pages
By Brian Patrick Mitchell