Showing posts with label clericalism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label clericalism. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 19, 2025

Clericalism?

Thursday, December 29, 2022

Chapp on the Rupnik Case

Tuesday, January 18, 2022

Constantinople on the Move

Tuesday, November 30, 2021

Bauerschmidt on the Pauline Reform


Saturday, November 13, 2021

Contra Roche



Wednesday, September 22, 2021

And What of Clericalism in the Heart of Rome?

Thursday, September 09, 2021

The Answer is Obvious

Wednesday, September 08, 2021

Hubris?

or was he bought off?

Thursday, August 26, 2021

The Future of Chalcedonian Orthodoxy in the United States?




Wednesday, August 25, 2021

Philip Lawler on Conscientious Objection to Vaccination

Monday, August 02, 2021

Latin Ecclesiology and Roman Claims about Primacy Are the Issue



Sunday, August 01, 2021

Clericalism, East and West

By what authority?




Thursday, July 22, 2021

German Bishops Seeking Justification for Their Own Behavior?

Monday, July 12, 2021

An Institutional Crisis

Thursday, June 17, 2021

A Return to Mysticism?



Various spiritual writers and theologians have been praised as being precursors of Vatican II in calling for the return of the Christian faithful to the pursuit of holiness. But was a synod the appropriate means for trying to implement such a reform? A centralized system cannot help but look for a centralized solution; was a better way possible? Are there too many human obstacles to the action of the Holy Spirit, especially in the form of ecclesial power structures?

Friday, June 11, 2021

The Latest from Marco Tosatti

Rome Exercising "Universal and Ordinary Jurisdiction"

There is an argument that since these ecclesial movements are international that only the bishop of Rome has the competent authority to deal with them. But perhaps there shouldn't be international ecclesial movements that are not subject to the oversight of the local ordinary -- after all, isn't that the current situation now? And if the head of a movement is found to be abusive? Then it is up to the other members of that movement to bring him to a canonical trial, with local bishops involved. Instead we have legislation from Rome to deal with a problem that should be handled at the local level first. There is nothing to Latin teaching on the papacy that guarantees that decisions made by the Roman Curia will be correct or that "Canon Law" will be legislated properly or justly. And the fact that abuses of authority by Rome do happen is an argument against Roman claims of primacy.

Thursday, June 10, 2021

Does He Have a Solution

"That sort of clericalism is bad, my sort of clericalism is good."

Are there priests who are poor pastors and spiritual fathers because they feel entitled because of their office? Are there priests who believe them superior to the Christian faithful because of an erroneous understanding of the dignity of Holy Orders and exaggerations arising from a sacramental theology that emphases "in persona Christi"? Are there priests who have not received the necessary "integral human development" that they need in order to be men and leaders? Yes to all these questions. But what would Jorge Bergoglio know about providing a solution to any of these issues? His form of clericalism is afflicting the patriarchate of Rome, and he is blind to it.

This Is Clericalism

Sunday, June 06, 2021

Remaking Latin Clerics in His Image



Spectator