This volume is the fruit of fifty-five years of solitude by a contemporary desert monk devoted to prayer. Available here: https://t.co/G5o1kx4wPy ****and on Kindle and Nook**** pic.twitter.com/VWFQu3EyTx
— SVS Press (@SVSPress) August 31, 2021
Showing posts with label Coptic Orthodox. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Coptic Orthodox. Show all posts
Tuesday, August 31, 2021
A New Book by St. Matthew the Poor
Tuesday, September 01, 2020
Sunday, August 16, 2020
Saturday, April 18, 2020
Tuesday, October 15, 2019
Sunday, September 15, 2019
Chalcedonian Orthodox...
Triumphalism? Stubbornness?
The “Smoking Gun” of Non-Chalcedonian Christianity by Fr. Alexander Webster
Has it been established that certain Coptic authorities are monothelites? Or are they being misunderstood, just as their miaphysitism is misunderstood as monophysitism?
Instead of engaging in long-distance polemics, would it not be better to seek face-to-face dialogue with others, or if that is not possible, to abstain from commenting on the ongoing dialogue and wait until the duly-appointed representatives of the various churches have done their work? After all, other Orthodox do recognize that the Oriental, or non-Chalcedonian Orthodox, are not heretical. Should we at least not talk to them and ask them their reasons why, rather than engaging in a hermeneutics of suspicion?
And then there is the so-called "heresy" of ecumenism... when it is the same as relativism or indifference to truth then it should be condemned as such, rather than as "ecumenism." What are we doing to live in accord with Christ's prayer that "they may be one"?
Dyothelitism
Monergism and Monothelitism
Monophysitism Reconsidered
The “Smoking Gun” of Non-Chalcedonian Christianity by Fr. Alexander Webster
Has it been established that certain Coptic authorities are monothelites? Or are they being misunderstood, just as their miaphysitism is misunderstood as monophysitism?
Instead of engaging in long-distance polemics, would it not be better to seek face-to-face dialogue with others, or if that is not possible, to abstain from commenting on the ongoing dialogue and wait until the duly-appointed representatives of the various churches have done their work? After all, other Orthodox do recognize that the Oriental, or non-Chalcedonian Orthodox, are not heretical. Should we at least not talk to them and ask them their reasons why, rather than engaging in a hermeneutics of suspicion?
And then there is the so-called "heresy" of ecumenism... when it is the same as relativism or indifference to truth then it should be condemned as such, rather than as "ecumenism." What are we doing to live in accord with Christ's prayer that "they may be one"?
Dyothelitism
Monergism and Monothelitism
Monophysitism Reconsidered
Thursday, March 14, 2019
Friday, February 15, 2019
Friday, November 09, 2018
Adam DeVille Reviews Ecumenism of Blood
CWR Dispatch: Ecumenism of Blood skillfully addresses questions about martyrs-saints, Western-Eastern relations by Dr. Adam A. J. DeVille
Hugh Somerville Knapman, OP, takes on complicated ecumenical issues, while also tracing Catholic understandings of martyrdom, canonization, and Christology.
Hugh Somerville Knapman, OP, takes on complicated ecumenical issues, while also tracing Catholic understandings of martyrdom, canonization, and Christology.
Wednesday, February 07, 2018
Tuesday, August 29, 2017
Saturday, July 22, 2017
Friday, December 23, 2016
Tuesday, November 15, 2016
Saturday, October 29, 2016
Tuesday, October 18, 2016
Wednesday, May 11, 2016
Sunday, February 28, 2016
Wednesday, February 10, 2016
Dialogue in Cairo
Glad to be partners with the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops ecumenical and international dialogues!
Posted by Ecumenical and Interreligious Affairs on Wednesday, February 10, 2016
Thursday, September 10, 2015
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)